Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs FFMMX
BWLCX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs FFMMX
BWLCX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BWLCX (266M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: FFMMX (1.64) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: BWLCX (15 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). BWLCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: FFMMX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). BWLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.57 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. BWLCX (14.13).
| BWLCX | FFMMX | BWLCX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.36 | 503% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.36 | 503% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.000 | 9.858 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.57 | 9.76 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.86 | 35.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.13 | 41.13 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement