Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs FFMMX
BWLCX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs FFMMX
BWLCX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. BWLCX (253M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: FFMMX (1.67) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: BWLCX (14 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). BWLCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: FFMMX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). BWLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.62 vs. FFMMX (9.92). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.66 vs. BWLCX (10.89).
| BWLCX | FFMMX | BWLCX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.36 | 503% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.36 | 503% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.060 | 6.654 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.62 | 9.92 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.29 | 37.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.89 | 39.66 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSBY | 18.28 | 0.08 | +0.44% |
| Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | |||
| NBOS | 27.81 | -0.29 | -1.02% |
| Neuberger Option Strategy ETF | |||
| SPXE | 79.49 | -1.09 | -1.35% |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy | |||
| IMCG | 96.00 | -1.49 | -1.53% |
| iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| BRIE | 29.87 | -0.85 | -2.77% |
| MFS Blended Research Intl Eq ETF | |||