Advertisement
BWLP vs NCT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLP is a StrongBuy and NCT is a Hold.
BWLP | NCT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 99 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 56 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BWLP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as NCT (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to NCT’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCT (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew significantly faster than NCT’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NCT (51) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to NCT’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCT (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCT’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCT (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCT’s over the last 12 months.
| BWLP | NCT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWLP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NCT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWLP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BWLP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NCT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BWLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while NCT (@Marine Shipping) price change was -68.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.62%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
BWLP is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.25% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
@Marine Shipping (-0.32% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BIBL | 54.64 | 0.58 | +1.07% |
| Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) | |||
| LBO | 24.02 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) | |||
| IBCB | 23.59 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Corporate ETF (IBCB) | |||
| BDYN | 27.78 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) | |||
| MATE | 32.37 | -0.45 | -1.36% |
| Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) | |||
BWLP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been closely correlated with LPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then LPG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWLP | 100% | +2.87% | ||
| LPG - BWLP | 74% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| INSW - BWLP | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| TNK - BWLP | 60% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
| TK - BWLP | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| FRO - BWLP | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More | ||||
NCT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NCT and TORO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCT and TORO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT | 100% | -6.41% | ||
| TORO - NCT | 11% Poorly correlated | -8.40% | ||
| PSHG - NCT | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICON - NCT | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
| SBLK - NCT | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.64% | ||
| BWLP - NCT | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.87% | ||
More | ||||