It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWLP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWLP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BWLP (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.20% price change this week, while SB (@Marine Shipping) price change was -1.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.90%.
BWLP is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
SB is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
BWLP | SB | BWLP / SB | |
Capitalization | 1.73B | 456M | 380% |
EBITDA | 767M | 125M | 614% |
Gain YTD | 2.178 | 11.987 | 18% |
P/E Ratio | 3.57 | 5.41 | 66% |
Revenue | 3.51B | 307M | 1,143% |
Total Cash | 93.5M | 72.3M | 129% |
Total Debt | 450M | 491M | 92% |
BWLP | SB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BWLP's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SB (20) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SB (31) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SB (63) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SB’s over the last 12 months.
SB's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as BWLP (62) in the null industry. This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to BWLP’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SB (65) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.
BWLP | SB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 11 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago62% | 3 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 6 days ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago41% | 3 days ago67% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FLUIX | 30.58 | -0.06 | -0.20% |
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val I | |||
WQAUX | 12.35 | -0.07 | -0.56% |
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra | |||
VSFAX | 27.79 | -0.28 | -1.00% |
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value A | |||
LGLSX | 45.96 | -0.79 | -1.69% |
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4 | |||
DREQX | 21.25 | -0.50 | -2.30% |
BNY Mellon Research Growth Z |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BWLP | 100% | -2.55% | ||
HAFN - BWLP | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
ECO - BWLP | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
CMRE - BWLP | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
DAC - BWLP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
SB - BWLP | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More |