Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLRX vs FFMMX
BWLRX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts BWLRX vs FFMMX
BWLRX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BWLRX (266M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than BWLRX: FFMMX (1.64) vs BWLRX (0.90). BWLRX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: BWLRX (9 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). BWLRX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). BWLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). BWLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: BWLRX (0) vs FFMMX (250). BWLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. BWLRX (24.18).
| BWLRX | FFMMX | BWLRX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.36 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.761 | 9.858 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.64 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.97 | 9.76 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.07 | 35.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.18 | 41.13 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement