BXSL
Price
$31.84
Change
+$0.37 (+1.18%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
73 days until earnings call
CLSPF
Price
$4.45
Change
-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BXSL vs CLSPF

Header iconBXSL vs CLSPF Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs CLSPFBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$31.84
Change+$0.37 (+1.18%)
Volume$1.17M
CapitalizationN/A
CANADIAN LIFE COS SPLIT
Price$4.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.45%)
Volume$1.21K
CapitalizationN/A
BXSL vs CLSPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. CLSPF commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Hold and CLSPF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (BXSL: $31.84 vs. CLSPF: $4.90)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and CLSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 123% vs. CLSPF: 19%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.98B vs. CLSPF: $29.39M
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.98B. CLSPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CLSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BXSL and CLSPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLSPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BXSL is a better buy in the short-term than CLSPF.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.96% price change this week, while CLSPF (@Investment Managers) price change was +9.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.80% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.98B) has a higher market cap than CLSPF($29.4M). BXSL has higher P/E ratio than CLSPF: BXSL (8.44) vs CLSPF (3.31). CLSPF YTD gains are higher at: 76.721 vs. BXSL (24.183). BXSL has higher revenues than CLSPF: BXSL (628M) vs CLSPF (4.01M).
BXSLCLSPFBXSL / CLSPF
Capitalization5.98B29.4M20,330%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.18376.72132%
P/E Ratio8.443.31255%
Revenue628M4.01M15,661%
Total CashN/A111M-
Total Debt4.91BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLCLSPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPAX20.400.05
+0.22%
Robinson Alternative Yld Pr-Mrgr SPACETF
PFEB36.59-0.03
-0.08%
Innovator US Equity Power Bffr ETF™ Feb
FEDM48.26-0.10
-0.22%
FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr
QTEC189.98-1.40
-0.73%
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF
WOOD74.87-0.66
-0.87%
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
+1.18%
ARCC - BXSL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
MAIN - BXSL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
HTGC - BXSL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
CSWC - BXSL
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
FSK - BXSL
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More

CLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSPF and QUCT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSPF and QUCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSPF
1D Price
Change %
CLSPF100%
+10.00%
QUCT - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
CION - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
BXSL - CLSPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
KWGHF - CLSPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - CLSPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More