BXSL
Price
$29.18
Change
-$2.51 (-7.92%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.98B
32 days until earnings call
CLSPF
Price
$4.16
Change
-$0.09 (-2.12%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
29.39M
Ad is loading...

BXSL vs CLSPF

Header iconBXSL vs CLSPF Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs CLSPFBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$29.18
Change-$2.51 (-7.92%)
Volume$22.38K
Capitalization5.98B
CANADIAN LIFE COS SPLIT
Price$4.16
Change-$0.09 (-2.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization29.39M
BXSL vs CLSPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. CLSPF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Hold and CLSPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $31.69 vs. CLSPF: $4.16)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and CLSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 207% vs. CLSPF: 15%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.98B vs. CLSPF: $29.39M
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.98B. CLSPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $29.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSPF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CLSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BXSL and CLSPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while CLSPF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.98B) has a higher market cap than CLSPF($29.4M). BXSL has higher P/E ratio than CLSPF: BXSL (8.44) vs CLSPF (3.31). BXSL YTD gains are higher at: 0.429 vs. CLSPF (-12.788). BXSL has higher revenues than CLSPF: BXSL (628M) vs CLSPF (4.01M).
BXSLCLSPFBXSL / CLSPF
Capitalization5.98B29.4M20,330%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.429-12.788-3%
P/E Ratio8.443.31255%
Revenue628M4.01M15,661%
Total CashN/A111M-
Total Debt4.91BN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNQI40.850.04
+0.10%
Vanguard Global ex-US Real Est ETF
FGD23.92-0.44
-1.81%
First Trust Dow Jones Global Sel Div ETF
PFFL8.37-0.35
-4.00%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
FNK47.53-3.86
-7.51%
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF
LCLG45.11-3.74
-7.65%
Logan Capital Broad Innovative Gr ETF

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-2.43%
MAIN - BXSL
68%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
FSK - BXSL
67%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
ARCC - BXSL
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
HTGC - BXSL
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
GBDC - BXSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More

CLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSPF and QUCT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSPF and QUCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSPF
1D Price
Change %
CLSPF100%
N/A
QUCT - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
CION - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
BXSL - CLSPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
KWGHF - CLSPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITPC - CLSPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More