BXSL
Price
$25.86
Change
-$0.11 (-0.42%)
Updated
Oct 17, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.98B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
NMFC
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.14 (+1.53%)
Updated
Oct 17, 12:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
974.27M
17 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXSL vs NMFC

Header iconBXSL vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs NMFCBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$25.86
Change-$0.11 (-0.42%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.98B
New Mountain Finance
Price$9.29
Change+$0.14 (+1.53%)
Volume$100
Capitalization974.27M
BXSL vs NMFC Comparison Chart in %
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. NMFC commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Hold and NMFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $25.97 vs. NMFC: $9.16)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 108% vs. NMFC: 93%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.98B vs. NMFC: $974.27M
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.98B. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $974.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $181.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than BXSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BXSL and NMFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.39% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.98B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($974M). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than BXSL: NMFC (12.05) vs BXSL (9.24). NMFC YTD gains are higher at: -10.758 vs. BXSL (-13.131). NMFC has less debt than BXSL: NMFC (1.77B) vs BXSL (7.09B). BXSL has higher revenues than NMFC: BXSL (662M) vs NMFC (89M).
BXSLNMFCBXSL / NMFC
Capitalization5.98B974M614%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.131-10.758122%
P/E Ratio9.2412.0577%
Revenue662M89M744%
Total Cash197MN/A-
Total Debt7.09B1.77B401%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTDCX38.64N/A
N/A
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China C
NTKLX77.09N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp A
ESPRX38.12N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value R6
VVPSX12.26-0.06
-0.49%
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap
RMEBX61.69-0.41
-0.66%
American Funds American Mutual R2E

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-1.85%
OBDC - BXSL
84%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
ARCC - BXSL
80%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
GBDC - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
GSBD - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
BCSF - BXSL
76%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
More

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-2.86%
BCSF - NMFC
77%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
ARCC - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
MFIC - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
TSLX - NMFC
73%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
BXSL - NMFC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
More