BXSL
Price
$26.87
Change
-$1.23 (-4.38%)
Updated
Apr 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.98B
28 days until earnings call
NMFC
Price
$9.11
Change
-$0.22 (-2.36%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BXSL vs NMFC

Header iconBXSL vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs NMFCBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$26.87
Change-$1.23 (-4.38%)
Volume$25.65K
Capitalization5.98B
New Mountain Finance
Price$9.11
Change-$0.22 (-2.36%)
Volume$1.31M
Capitalization1.34B
BXSL vs NMFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. NMFC commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a StrongBuy and NMFC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $28.10 vs. NMFC: $9.33)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 441% vs. NMFC: 265%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.98B vs. NMFC: $1.34B
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.98B. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BXSL and NMFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than BXSL.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -13.16% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was -15.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -7.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-7.50% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.98B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($1.34B). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than BXSL: NMFC (10.15) vs BXSL (8.44). BXSL YTD gains are higher at: -10.948 vs. NMFC (-14.694). NMFC has less debt than BXSL: NMFC (1.79B) vs BXSL (4.91B). BXSL has higher revenues than NMFC: BXSL (628M) vs NMFC (144M).
BXSLNMFCBXSL / NMFC
Capitalization5.98B1.34B447%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.948-14.69475%
P/E Ratio8.4410.1583%
Revenue628M144M436%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.91B1.79B275%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSAHX12.69N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Investor
WCMJX9.97-0.15
-1.48%
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
PRDAX10.61-0.22
-2.03%
Principal Diversified Real Asset A
BBIEX11.96-0.28
-2.29%
Bridge Builder International Equity
PURGX17.79-0.52
-2.84%
PGIM Global Real Estate R4

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been loosely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-11.33%
FSK - BXSL
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
NMFC - BXSL
59%
Loosely correlated
-6.70%
ARCC - BXSL
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
BCSF - BXSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.75%
FDUS - BXSL
56%
Loosely correlated
-5.64%
More

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with GLAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then GLAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-6.70%
GLAD - NMFC
68%
Closely correlated
-6.26%
ARCC - NMFC
67%
Closely correlated
-3.30%
SLRC - NMFC
67%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
MAIN - NMFC
66%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
CSWC - NMFC
64%
Loosely correlated
-5.46%
More