It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYDDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BYDDF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -3.92% price change this week, while NIO (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -11.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.56%.
BYDDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
NIO is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
BYDDF | NIO | BYDDF / NIO | |
Capitalization | 108B | 9.96B | 1,085% |
EBITDA | 26.5B | -15.88B | -167% |
Gain YTD | 33.002 | -43.330 | -76% |
P/E Ratio | 36.50 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 477B | 48.5B | 984% |
Total Cash | 66.7B | 27.3B | 244% |
Total Debt | 34.7B | 28.4B | 122% |
BYDDF | NIO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BYDDF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (57) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BYDDF’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BYDDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NIO (91) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BYDDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BYDDF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (98) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BYDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BYDDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as NIO (63) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BYDDF’s stock grew similarly to NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BYDDF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIO (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that BYDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIO’s over the last 12 months.
BYDDF | NIO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago79% | 9 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago72% | 6 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VSMVX | 384.14 | 2.10 | +0.55% |
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Val Idx Instl | |||
WLIVX | 15.17 | 0.06 | +0.40% |
WCM Focused International Equity Inv | |||
NCLEX | 30.63 | 0.11 | +0.36% |
Nicholas Limited Edition I | |||
JNGLX | 78.69 | -0.11 | -0.14% |
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences D | |||
NWAWX | 16.84 | -0.08 | -0.47% |
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq Instl Ser |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYDDF has been closely correlated with BYDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BYDDF jumps, then BYDDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYDDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDF | 100% | +2.90% | ||
BYDDY - BYDDF | 93% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
GELYY - BYDDF | 66% Closely correlated | +4.65% | ||
XPEV - BYDDF | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.77% | ||
GELYF - BYDDF | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.82% | ||
NIO - BYDDF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIO has been closely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NIO jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIO | 100% | +0.78% | ||
XPEV - NIO | 76% Closely correlated | +4.77% | ||
BYDDF - NIO | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
LI - NIO | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
GELYY - NIO | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.65% | ||
BYDDY - NIO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More |