BYFC vs FITBI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a Hold and FITBI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFITBI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BYFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FITBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FITBI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FITBI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while FITBI (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
BYFC is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.
FITBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BYFC | FITBI | BYFC / FITBI | |
| Capitalization | 51.1M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.423 | 2.222 | -289% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 34.4M | 8.54B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 6.19M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 224M | 18.9B | 1% |
BYFC | FITBI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FITBI's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (96) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITBI’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
FITBI's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
BYFC's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FITBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew significantly faster than FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
BYFC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FITBI (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew similarly to FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
BYFC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FITBI (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew significantly faster than FITBI’s over the last 12 months.
| FITBI | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 14% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 16% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 7% |
BYFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYFC | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| FITB - BYFC | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| KEY - BYFC | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| FITBI - BYFC | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HBAN - BYFC | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| COLB - BYFC | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
More | ||||
FITBI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITBI has been loosely correlated with WTFCP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITBI jumps, then WTFCP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITBI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITBI | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTFCP - FITBI | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| WSBCP - FITBI | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| OCFCP - FITBI | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| FFWM - FITBI | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| TECTP - FITBI | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||