BYFC
Price
$10.11
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
93.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FITB
Price
$56.50
Change
-$0.09 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
51.22B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYFC vs FITB

BYFC vs FITB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. FITB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a StrongBuy and FITB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BYFC: $10.11 vs. FITB: $56.50)
Brand notoriety: BYFC and FITB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 74% vs. FITB: 111%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $93.76M vs. FITB: $51.22B
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $93.76M. FITB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $51.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFITB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FITB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FITB is a better buy in the long-term than BYFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYFC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FITB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FITB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BYFC is a better buy in the short-term than FITB.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while FITB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITB($51.2B) has a higher market cap than BYFC($93.8M). BYFC has higher P/E ratio than FITB: BYFC (173.00) vs FITB (19.02). BYFC YTD gains are higher at: 36.622 vs. FITB (22.655). BYFC has less debt than FITB: BYFC (309M) vs FITB (19.5B). FITB has higher revenues than BYFC: FITB (9.48B) vs BYFC (36.2M).
BYFCFITBBYFC / FITB
Capitalization93.8M51.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.62222.655162%
P/E Ratio173.0019.02909%
Revenue36.2M9.48B0%
Total Cash6.04MN/A-
Total Debt309M19.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC vs FITB: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
FITB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8995
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FITB's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (96) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

BYFC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

BYFC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FITB (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFCFITB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FITB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KTTA0.460.02
+3.58%
Pasithea Therapeutics Corp
GWW1382.2226.73
+1.97%
WW Grainger
VSNT35.990.10
+0.28%
Versant Media Group Inc
PSEC2.13-0.02
-0.93%
Prospect Capital Corp
LIEN9.24-0.10
-1.07%
Chicago Atlantic BDC Inc

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
+0.10%
FITB - BYFC
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
HWBK - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
HBAN - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
COLB - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
EFSC - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More