It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYFC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.68% price change this week, while KEY (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
BYFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2023.
KEY is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
BYFC | KEY | BYFC / KEY | |
Capitalization | 51.1M | 14.7B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 3.881 | 30.171 | 13% |
P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 17.60 | 58% |
Revenue | 34.4M | 6.22B | 1% |
Total Cash | 6.19M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 224M | 22.6B | 1% |
BYFC | KEY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BYFC's Valuation (13) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEY (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEY’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYFC (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew significantly faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BYFC (6) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.
BYFC | KEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago78% | 4 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago84% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BYFC | 100% | +0.23% | ||
FITB - BYFC | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
KEY - BYFC | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
HBAN - BYFC | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
COLB - BYFC | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
EFSC - BYFC | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEY has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KEY jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KEY | 100% | -2.20% | ||
CFG - KEY | 85% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
RF - KEY | 84% Closely correlated | -2.26% | ||
HBAN - KEY | 82% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
ZION - KEY | 82% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
FNB - KEY | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
More |