BYFC
Price
$7.76
Change
-$0.11 (-1.40%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
71.36M
UNTN
Price
$21.11
Change
+$0.15 (+0.72%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BYFC vs UNTN

Header iconBYFC vs UNTN Comparison
Open Charts BYFC vs UNTNBanner chart's image
Broadway Financial
Price$7.76
Change-$0.11 (-1.40%)
Volume$3.79K
Capitalization71.36M
United Tennessee Bankshares
Price$21.11
Change+$0.15 (+0.72%)
Volume$4.92K
Capitalization15.63M
BYFC vs UNTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BYFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYFC vs. UNTN commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYFC is a Buy and UNTN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (BYFC: $7.76 vs. UNTN: $21.11)
Brand notoriety: BYFC and UNTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYFC: 39% vs. UNTN: 394%
Market capitalization -- BYFC: $71.36M vs. UNTN: $15.63M
BYFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $71.36M. UNTN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BYFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNTN is a better buy in the long-term than BYFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNTN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNTN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNTN is a better buy in the short-term than BYFC.

Price Growth

BYFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while UNTN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BYFC($71.4M) has a higher market cap than UNTN($15.6M). BYFC has higher P/E ratio than UNTN: BYFC (173.00) vs UNTN (11.66). UNTN YTD gains are higher at: 34.725 vs. BYFC (13.285). UNTN has more cash in the bank: 12.8M vs. BYFC (6.04M). UNTN has less debt than BYFC: UNTN (1M) vs BYFC (309M). BYFC has higher revenues than UNTN: BYFC (36.4M) vs UNTN (6.38M).
BYFCUNTNBYFC / UNTN
Capitalization71.4M15.6M458%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.28534.72538%
P/E Ratio173.0011.661,483%
Revenue36.4M6.38M570%
Total Cash6.04M12.8M47%
Total Debt309M1M30,900%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYFC vs UNTN: Fundamental Ratings
BYFC
UNTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
8476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNTN's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BYFC (84) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BYFC (43) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to BYFC’s over the last 12 months.

BYFC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UNTN (25) in the null industry. This means that BYFC’s stock grew similarly to UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFCUNTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BYFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INOD42.952.88
+7.19%
Innodata
FNLC26.331.11
+4.40%
First Bancorp
JHG43.921.17
+2.74%
Janus Henderson Group plc
GOOGL203.342.34
+1.16%
Alphabet
FOXX6.60-0.01
-0.15%
Foxx Development Holdings Inc

BYFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BYFC and FITB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BYFC and FITB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYFC
1D Price
Change %
BYFC100%
-1.40%
FITB - BYFC
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
KEY - BYFC
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
FITBI - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
HBAN - BYFC
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
COLB - BYFC
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.95%
More

UNTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNTN has been loosely correlated with CZBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNTN jumps, then CZBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNTN
1D Price
Change %
UNTN100%
N/A
CZBC - UNTN
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KPCUF - UNTN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFWV - UNTN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYFC - UNTN
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
FFDF - UNTN
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More