BZ vs UPWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongSell and UPWK is a Sell.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UPWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| BZ | UPWK | BZ / UPWK | |
| Capitalization | 8.02B | 1.68B | 478% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.46M | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.085 | 0.269 | -7,095% |
| P/E Ratio | 100.83 | 203.50 | 50% |
| Revenue | N/A | 689M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 550M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 368M | - |
UPWK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BZ | UPWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FIBR | 87.09 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Fixed Inc Bal Rsk Sysmc ETF | |||
| LDUR | 95.09 | -0.02 | -0.02% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | |||
| EET | 52.67 | -0.05 | -0.09% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
| FVD | 45.32 | -0.16 | -0.35% |
| First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF | |||
| RTH | 222.56 | -3.19 | -1.41% |
| VanEck Retail ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
UPWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPWK has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPWK jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPWK | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| BZ - UPWK | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| MAN - UPWK | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
| BBSI - UPWK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| RHI - UPWK | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
| ADP - UPWK | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||