BZ vs UPWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongBuy and UPWK is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UPWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| BZ | UPWK | BZ / UPWK | |
| Capitalization | 8.02B | 1.68B | 478% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.46M | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.913 | -20.183 | -193% |
| P/E Ratio | 100.83 | 203.50 | 50% |
| Revenue | N/A | 689M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 550M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 368M | - |
UPWK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BZ | UPWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MDLV | 27.14 | 0.18 | +0.67% |
| Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| VEGI | 37.09 | 0.24 | +0.65% |
| iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF | |||
| CLOZ | 26.57 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF | |||
| IBHG | 22.33 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| IQLT | 39.69 | -0.33 | -0.82% |
| iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
UPWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPWK has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPWK jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPWK | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| BZ - UPWK | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| MAN - UPWK | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| BBSI - UPWK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| RHI - UPWK | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.24% | ||
| ADP - UPWK | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||