BZLFF vs WILC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLFF is a Hold and WILC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BZLFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWILC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BZLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WILC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
WILC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- WILC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BZLFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WILC (@Food Distributors) price change was +5.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
WILC is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food Distributors (+1.54% weekly)Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
| BZLFF | WILC | BZLFF / WILC | |
| Capitalization | 12.5B | 144M | 8,681% |
| EBITDA | 1.04B | 27.3M | 3,791% |
| Gain YTD | -6.875 | -4.924 | 140% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.45 | 17.60 | 116% |
| Revenue | 12B | 543M | 2,210% |
| Total Cash | 1.5B | 240M | 627% |
| Total Debt | 3.13B | 2.21M | 141,931% |
BZLFF | WILC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WILC's Valuation (17) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLFF (53) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WILC (53) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BZLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WILC’s over the last 12 months.
WILC's SMR Rating (49) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLFF (94) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
WILC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (50) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.
BZLFF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WILC (79) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BZLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WILC’s over the last 12 months.
| WILC | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
BZLFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFF and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFF and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BZLFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BZLFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HFFG - BZLFF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.51% | ||
| WILC - BZLFF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BZLFY - BZLFF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AIXN - BZLFF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IVFH - BZLFF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||
WILC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WILC and MTEX have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILC and MTEX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WILC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILC | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| MTEX - WILC | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHEF - WILC | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| BZLFF - WILC | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UNFI - WILC | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| ANDE - WILC | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||