BZLFF
Price
$34.10
Change
+$1.51 (+4.63%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
10.92B
WILC
Price
$20.27
Change
+$0.02 (+0.10%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
284.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLFF vs WILC

Header iconBZLFF vs WILC Comparison
Open Charts BZLFF vs WILCBanner chart's image
Bunzl
Price$34.10
Change+$1.51 (+4.63%)
Volume$160
Capitalization10.92B
G Willi-Food International
Price$20.27
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization284.43M
BZLFF vs WILC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLFF vs. WILC commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLFF is a Buy and WILC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLFF: $34.10 vs. WILC: $20.25)
Brand notoriety: BZLFF and WILC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLFF: 47% vs. WILC: 49%
Market capitalization -- BZLFF: $10.94B vs. WILC: $284.43M
BZLFF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $10.94B. WILC’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $284.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $38.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWILC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WILC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WILC is a better buy in the long-term than BZLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WILC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WILC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLFF is a better buy in the short-term than WILC.

Price Growth

BZLFF (@Food Distributors) experienced а +15.24% price change this week, while WILC (@Food Distributors) price change was -4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +16.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+16.62% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLFF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than WILC($284M). BZLFF has higher P/E ratio than WILC: BZLFF (17.40) vs WILC (9.88). WILC YTD gains are higher at: 31.423 vs. BZLFF (-23.388). BZLFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.17B vs. WILC (94.1M). BZLFF has higher revenues than WILC: BZLFF (11.6B) vs WILC (598M).
BZLFFWILCBZLFF / WILC
Capitalization10.9B284M3,838%
EBITDA1.17B94.1M1,244%
Gain YTD-23.38831.423-74%
P/E Ratio17.409.88176%
Revenue11.6B598M1,940%
Total Cash1.38BN/A-
Total Debt3.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLFF vs WILC: Fundamental Ratings
BZLFF
WILC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3678
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7861
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WILC's Valuation (7) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (34) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (78) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's SMR Rating (100) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (100) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (62) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

WILC's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BZLFF (100) in the null industry. This means that WILC’s stock grew similarly to BZLFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLFFWILC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WILC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCDY56.060.67
+1.21%
IMCD Group NV
POROF0.36N/A
N/A
Panoro Minerals Ltd.
EVGPF0.07N/A
N/A
Evergrande Property Services Group Limited
UNVGY14.33-0.15
-1.04%
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP
MNXXF0.04N/A
-4.66%
Manganese X Energy Corp.

BZLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFF and HFFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFF and HFFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLFF
1D Price
Change %
BZLFF100%
+4.63%
HFFG - BZLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
WILC - BZLFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.71%
BZLFY - BZLFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
AIXN - BZLFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVFH - BZLFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More

WILC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WILC and USFD have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WILC and USFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WILC
1D Price
Change %
WILC100%
-4.71%
USFD - WILC
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
PFGC - WILC
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
CHEF - WILC
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MTEX - WILC
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
UNFI - WILC
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More