BZLYF
Price
$10.71
Change
+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.35B
HIPO
Price
$33.24
Change
+$0.32 (+0.97%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
831.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BZLYF vs HIPO

Header iconBZLYF vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs HIPOBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$10.71
Change+$0.19 (+1.81%)
Volume$3.15K
Capitalization6.35B
Hippo Holdings
Price$33.24
Change+$0.32 (+0.97%)
Volume$160.06K
Capitalization831.93M
BZLYF vs HIPO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. HIPO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Hold and HIPO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $10.70 vs. HIPO: $33.24)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and HIPO are both not notable
BZLYF represents the Specialty Insurance, while HIPO is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 174% vs. HIPO: 90%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $6.35B vs. HIPO: $831.93M
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $6.35B. HIPO’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $831.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $16.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than HIPO.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($832M). HIPO YTD gains are higher at: 24.169 vs. BZLYF (7.168). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 986M vs. HIPO (454M). HIPO has less debt than BZLYF: HIPO (54M) vs BZLYF (620M). BZLYF has higher revenues than HIPO: BZLYF (1.16B) vs HIPO (425M).
BZLYFHIPOBZLYF / HIPO
Capitalization6.36B832M764%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.16824.16930%
P/E Ratio7.09N/A-
Revenue1.16B425M272%
Total Cash986M454M217%
Total Debt620M54M1,148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMPAX30.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value A
WPGSX11.29N/A
N/A
WPG Partners Select Small Cap Value Ins
FITGX22.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Growth M
IHSFX23.79N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Company F
GNXIX16.63N/A
N/A
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation I

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
+1.90%
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-23.85%
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
+0.97%
LMND - HIPO
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
ROOT - HIPO
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
AIZ - HIPO
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
FNF - HIPO
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
ORI - HIPO
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More