BZLYF
Price
$10.34
Change
+$0.06 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.74B
HIPO
Price
$26.16
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
444.16M
Ad is loading...

BZLYF vs HIPO

Header iconBZLYF vs HIPO Comparison
Open Charts BZLYF vs HIPOBanner chart's image
Beazley
Price$10.34
Change+$0.06 (+0.58%)
Volume$1.74K
Capitalization4.74B
Hippo Holdings
Price$26.16
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$150.16K
Capitalization444.16M
BZLYF vs HIPO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BZLYF vs. HIPO commentary
Jan 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZLYF is a Buy and HIPO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BZLYF: $10.34 vs. HIPO: $26.16)
Brand notoriety: BZLYF and HIPO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BZLYF: 30% vs. HIPO: 71%
Market capitalization -- BZLYF: $4.74B vs. HIPO: $444.16M
BZLYF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $4.74B. HIPO’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $444.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BZLYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BZLYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BZLYF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BZLYF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLYF is a better buy in the short-term than HIPO.

Price Growth

BZLYF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +3.51% price change this week, while HIPO (@Specialty Insurance) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was -2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

HIPO is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (-2.21% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLYF($4.74B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($444M). BZLYF has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: BZLYF (26.67) vs HIPO (0.45). BZLYF YTD gains are higher at: 3.513 vs. HIPO (-2.279). BZLYF has more cash in the bank: 652M vs. HIPO (401M). HIPO has less debt than BZLYF: HIPO (14.8M) vs BZLYF (621M). BZLYF has higher revenues than HIPO: BZLYF (3.44B) vs HIPO (210M).
BZLYFHIPOBZLYF / HIPO
Capitalization4.74B444M1,068%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.513-2.279-154%
P/E Ratio26.670.455,875%
Revenue3.44B210M1,640%
Total Cash652M401M163%
Total Debt621M14.8M4,196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BZLYF: Fundamental Ratings
BZLYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BZLYFHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BZLYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHSGX27.710.10
+0.36%
JHancock U.S. Growth R4
AUICX31.800.09
+0.28%
AB Equity Income C
ACIIX8.380.02
+0.24%
American Century Equity Income I
BMIYX6.840.01
+0.15%
BNY Mellon Income Stock Y
FRNKX15.85-0.04
-0.25%
Frank Value Inv

BZLYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLYF and ACMTA have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLYF and ACMTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLYF
1D Price
Change %
BZLYF100%
N/A
ACMTA - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIPO - BZLYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
TRRSF - BZLYF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
FACO - BZLYF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
RYAN - BZLYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HIPO and FNF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIPO and FNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-0.19%
FNF - HIPO
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
ACT - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
TIPT - HIPO
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
FAF - HIPO
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
TRUP - HIPO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
More