Advertisement
CAAP vs PAC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Corporación América Airports (CAAP) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico (PAC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CAAP and PAC are airport concession operators, but they serve sharply different markets: CAAP spans 52 airports across Latin America, Europe, and Eurasia, while PAC concentrates on 12 Mexican and 2 Jamaican airports plus the Cross Border Xpress.
- CAAP's recent profile has been defined by a major catalyst — an 18-year extension of its Argentine concession alongside a $7.3 billion investment plan — while PAC's results show expanding margins against declining passenger traffic.
- On valuation, CAAP trades at a materially lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio than PAC, a key divergence in relative positioning between the two names.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: CAAP — based on trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, the AI framework currently favors Corporación América Airports.
- For deeper context, explore CAAP Major News and CAAP Today's Price Move, as well as PAC Major News and PAC Today's Price Move.
- To see how automated strategies are trading tickers like these in the current environment, browse the Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Airport operators sit at the intersection of consumer travel demand, global trade, and long-dated infrastructure concessions, making them a distinctive corner of the industrials sector. CAAP (Corporación América Airports S.A.) and PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) both monetize these dynamics, yet they do so through very different geographic and regulatory lenses. This stock comparison is most relevant for investors weighing Latin American infrastructure exposure, dividend income, and the trade-off between a diversified global footprint and a focused Mexican-and-Caribbean franchise. By examining recent performance, catalysts, and market positioning, traders can better assess which name currently offers the more compelling risk-reward profile.
CAAP Overview and Recent Performance
Corporación América Airports is one of the world's leading private airport operators, managing 52 airports across Latin America, Europe, and Eurasia, with a particularly significant presence in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Armenia, and Uruguay. In recent weeks, CAAP has benefited from a landmark development: Argentine authorities approved an 18-year extension of its concession agreement together with a $7.3 billion investment plan, a move that reduces long-term regulatory uncertainty and extends the company's cash-flow visibility.
Traffic trends have been mixed but generally resilient. September passenger traffic rose 3.4% year over year to 7.7 million, though August figures showed a modest 0.9% decline tied to softer domestic activity in Argentina and Brazil. The company has also continued portfolio expansion, raising its stake in Italy's Toscana Aeroporti to approximately 68%, and has signaled confidence through a newly initiated dividend. Despite a pullback from earlier highs, the stock trades near a trailing P/E of roughly 13–14, well below many peers, with analysts' consensus targets implying meaningful upside.
PAC Overview and Recent Performance
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico operates twelve international airports in Mexico's Pacific and Central regions — including major hubs in Guadalajara and Tijuana and tourist gateways such as Puerto Vallarta and Los Cabos — along with two airports in Jamaica and the Cross Border Xpress (CBX) connecting Tijuana to San Diego. In recent market activity, PAC reported third-quarter results that highlighted a notable divergence between volume and profitability: revenue excluding construction services rose roughly 13% and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) expanded about 19%, with margins near 68%, even as passenger traffic declined approximately 1.4%.
That traffic softness reflects capacity constraints — including aircraft grounded for engine inspections — and broader macroeconomic headwinds in Mexico. A positive recent catalyst arrived when U.S. regulators lifted restrictions on Mexican carriers adding certain U.S. routes, supporting the cross-border travel outlook. PAC also completed its acquisition and consolidation of CBX, adding scale, and carries a dividend yield near 4%. The shares, however, remain roughly 25% below their 52-week high, reflecting investor caution about near-term passenger trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of automated trading strategies from a much larger universe of AI-driven bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor and trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strategies best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, statistical profile, and roster of traded tickers, allowing traders to filter by the metrics that matter most to them. Whether you prefer short-term momentum approaches or longer-horizon trend models, this page offers a practical window into how algorithmic systems are positioning across names like CAAP and PAC. Explore the Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligned with your objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two operators diverge most clearly on geographic concentration and valuation. CAAP offers diversification across multiple countries and continents, which can cushion the impact of any single market's downturn — though Argentina's history of currency instability and hyperinflation accounting (IAS 29) remains a structural risk. PAC, by contrast, is a more focused, higher-margin Mexican franchise with a proven dividend record, but its concentration also exposes it more directly to Mexican macroeconomic policy and airline capacity constraints.
On growth drivers, CAAP's near-term narrative centers on concession rebalancing and expanded investment commitments that should support long-term capacity and revenue, while PAC's story is anchored in margin expansion, CBX integration, and cross-border route recovery. Risk profiles differ too: CAAP carries execution risk around its large capital program, whereas PAC faces near-term traffic declines that have pressured sentiment. In terms of market positioning, CAAP trades at a lower earnings multiple with a recently initiated dividend, while PAC commands a premium valuation supported by its higher-margin, cash-generative operations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI framework currently favors CAAP over PAC. The decisive factors are CAAP's recently secured long-term concession extension, its more diversified geographic footprint, its comparatively lower valuation, and improving traffic momentum in key markets — contrasted with PAC's ongoing passenger-volume declines and higher earnings multiple. While PAC's margin strength and dividend profile remain notable, the AI model's emphasis on favorable catalysts and relative value tilts the balance toward Corporación América Airports at this stage. This reflects a probabilistic assessment of current conditions rather than a guarantee of future performance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAAP is a StrongBuy and PAC is a Buy.
Momentum Indicator for CAAP turns positive, indicating new upward trend
CAAP saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 80 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 67 of the 80 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CAAP just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where CAAP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 37 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
CAAP moved above its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +6.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CAAP advanced for three days, in 222 of 278 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
CAAP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for CAAP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CAAP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator for CAAP entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 10 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 64, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CAAP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: CAAP's P/B Ratio (2.221) is slightly higher than the industry average of (0.918). P/E Ratio (13.864) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-5.910). CAAP's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.010) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.572). CAAP has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.148) as compared to the industry average of (0.062). P/S Ratio (1.817) is also within normal values, averaging (8.002).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PAC in upward trend: 10-day moving average moved above 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026
The 10-day moving average for PAC crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 18 of 22 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PAC as a result. In 57 of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PAC just turned positive on October 19, 2026. Looking at past instances where PAC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
PAC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +4.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PAC advanced for three days, in 221 of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 14 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
PAC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 64, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 37 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.281) is normal, around the industry mean (0.918). P/E Ratio (1.348) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-5.910). PAC's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.072) is slightly higher than the industry average of (0.572). PAC has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.171) as compared to the industry average of (0.062). P/S Ratio (4.885) is also within normal values, averaging (8.002).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PAC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
CAAP | PAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 1 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAC's Valuation (37) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (61). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (31). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's SMR Rating (35) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (51). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.
PAC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (47). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAAP's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (97). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.
| CAAP | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 15 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAAP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CAAP (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +4.64% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +5.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
PAC is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Air Freight/Couriers (+1.63% weekly)The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
Advertisement
CAAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAAP has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAAP jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAAP | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| OMAB - CAAP | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| ASR - CAAP | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| PAC - CAAP | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| JOBY - CAAP | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
| SRTA - CAAP | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | +2.21% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| UP - PAC | 20% Poorly correlated | -10.87% | ||
| JOBY - PAC | 17% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XPND | 35.97 | -0.15 | -0.41% |
| First Trust Expanded Technology ETF (XPND) | |||
| MFDX | 40.72 | -0.20 | -0.50% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) | |||
| TXUG | 26.04 | -0.14 | -0.52% |
| Thornburg International Growth Fund ETF (TXUG) | |||
| XAGG | 48.56 | -0.26 | -0.53% |
| Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG) | |||
| PCF | 4.98 | -0.07 | -1.39% |
| High Income Securities Fund | |||