CAAP
Price
$24.30
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.26B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAC
Price
$200.96
Change
+$4.35 (+2.21%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.72B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAAP vs PAC

CAAP vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAAP vs. PAC commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAAP is a StrongBuy and PAC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAAP vs PAC: Fundamental Ratings
CAAP
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1247
SMR RATING
1..100
5135
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6956
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
856

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAAP's Valuation (70) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (82). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Other Transportation industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAC (47). This means that CAAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAC’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's SMR Rating (35) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (51). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.

CAAP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as PAC (72). This means that CAAP’s stock grew similarly to PAC’s over the last 12 months.

PAC's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Other Transportation industry is in the same range as CAAP (69). This means that PAC’s stock grew similarly to CAAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAAPPAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (CAAP: $24.28 vs. PAC: $196.61)
Brand notoriety: CAAP and PAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAAP: 205% vs. PAC: 125%
Market capitalization -- CAAP: $4.26B vs. PAC: $12.72B
CAAP [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $4.26B. PAC’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $12.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $2.17M to $58.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAAP and PAC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAAP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAAP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAAP is a better buy in the short-term than PAC.

Price Growth

CAAP (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -7.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

PAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+2.07% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CAAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IIM10.690.23
+2.20%
INVESCO VALUE Municipal Income TRUST
CAGE28.780.16
+0.56%
Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE)
QBKF26.030.03
+0.11%
AllianzIM U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF (QBKF)
HYD48.060.03
+0.06%
VanEck High Yield Muni ETF (HYD)
SOYB27.20-0.31
-1.13%
Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB)

CAAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAAP has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAAP jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAAP
1D Price
Change %
CAAP100%
-4.56%
OMAB - CAAP
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
ASR - CAAP
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
PAC - CAAP
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.28%
JOBY - CAAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
SRTA - CAAP
15%
Poorly correlated
-5.48%
More

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
-4.28%
ASR - PAC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
CAAP - PAC
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.56%
UP - PAC
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%
JOBY - PAC
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
SRTA - PAC
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.48%
More