Cable One (CABO) and Charter Communications (CHTR) are key players in the U.S. broadband and cable television sector, facing similar headwinds from cord-cutting and fiber competition. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers in the current environment. Traders seeking relative value in telecommunications and investors eyeing sector recovery will find insights into momentum, risks, and AI-driven perspectives on which may offer better near-term potential.
Cable One, Inc. (CABO) provides residential broadband internet, cable video, and phone services primarily in mid-sized U.S. markets. In recent market activity, the stock has faced downward pressure, trading around $90-$105 amid broader sector challenges and a 64.7% decline over the past year. Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue contraction to $353 million, below expectations, driven by customer losses and pricing dynamics. Sentiment has been influenced by competition from fixed wireless and fiber providers, though strategic pushes into mobile and multi-gig services aim to stabilize growth. Volatility persists, with shares reacting sharply to earnings misses.
Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR), operating as Spectrum, is one of the largest U.S. cable operators, offering broadband, video, voice, and mobile services nationwide. Recent weeks saw significant volatility, with shares dropping over 30% post-Q1 2026 earnings due to an EPS miss and revenue of $13.60 billion slightly below forecasts. Positive notes include 368,000 net mobile line additions and $963 million in share repurchases, signaling confidence amid broadband subscriber pressures. Trading near $165, the stock reflects debt concerns but benefits from scale in recent market positioning.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These curated bots excel in current market conditions, boasting annualized returns ranging from +23.67% to +164.21%, win rates of 51.24% to 88.14%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Timeframes vary from 1-day holds to 50-day swings, with approaches like multi-agent signals, TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors, and sector rotations in semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and industrials. Virtual agents deliver real-time signals with risk management, often outperforming benchmarks. Explore these high-probability options to enhance your trading edge.
CABO and CHTR share broadband exposure but differ in scale: CHTR's national footprint contrasts CABO's regional focus, enabling mobile diversification for Charter amid video declines. Growth drivers favor CHTR with mobile additions versus CABO's multi-gig emphasis. Recent momentum shows CHTR with better YTD relative performance despite post-earnings dips, while CABO grapples with steeper declines. Risks include competition for both, but CHTR faces higher debt scrutiny. Market sentiment leans toward Charter's buybacks and size for resilience.
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward CHTR with moderate conviction, citing superior scale, mobile subscriber momentum, and share repurchase activity as stabilizing factors amid sector headwinds. While both exhibit earnings pressures, CHTR's relative YTD strength and lower valuation suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance versus CABO's contraction challenges.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CABO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CABO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CABO (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -16.82% price change this week, while CHTR (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -9.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.42%.
CABO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
CHTR is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CABO | CHTR | CABO / CHTR | |
| Capitalization | 354M | 19B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 174M | 21.2B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -44.714 | -25.816 | 173% |
| P/E Ratio | 101.55 | 4.19 | 2,424% |
| Revenue | 1.47B | 54.6B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 166M | 517M | 32% |
| Total Debt | 3.11B | 96.8B | 3% |
CABO | CHTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CABO's Valuation (56) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (76). This means that CABO’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
CABO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CHTR (100). This means that CABO’s stock grew similarly to CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's SMR Rating (31) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CABO (94). This means that CHTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CABO’s over the last 12 months.
CHTR's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as CABO (95). This means that CHTR’s stock grew similarly to CABO’s over the last 12 months.
CABO's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHTR (97). This means that CABO’s stock grew significantly faster than CHTR’s over the last 12 months.
| CABO | CHTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 9 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHTR has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 100% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHTR jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHTR | 100% | -3.36% | ||
| LBRDK - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| LBRDA - CHTR | 100% Closely correlated | -3.38% | ||
| CMCSA - CHTR | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| LBRDB - CHTR | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LBRDP - CHTR | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||