CABO
Price
$43.85
Change
+$2.92 (+7.13%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
248.19M
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LBTYA
Price
$11.21
Change
+$0.17 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.75B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CABO vs LBTYA

CABO vs LBTYA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cable One, Inc. (CABO) vs. Liberty Global Ltd. (LBTYA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CABO has delivered a year-to-date return of +18.93%, significantly outperforming LBTYA's +3.95% amid recent market activity.
  • CABO offers a high forward dividend yield of 9.01%, providing income appeal, while LBTYA pays no dividend.
  • Both stocks operate in the broadband sector but CABO focuses on U.S. residential services with recent Q1 net income growth despite revenue decline, contrasting LBTYA's stable European operations.
  • CABO's market cap stands at $519M with higher debt-to-equity (210%) versus LBTYA's $3.9B cap and 97% ratio, highlighting scale differences.
  • Recent sentiment for CABO reflects earnings-driven volatility, while LBTYA shows steadier trading ahead of its Q1 results.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines CABO and LBTYA, two players in the competitive broadband and telecommunications sector facing cord-cutting pressures and evolving consumer demands. Investors tracking telecom relative performance, dividend opportunities, or regional exposure in U.S. versus European markets may find value here. By analyzing recent market positioning, financial metrics, and momentum, traders gain insights into potential trade-offs in growth, stability, and risk amid shifting sector dynamics.

CABO Overview and Recent Performance

Cable One, Inc. (CABO) delivers broadband internet, video, and voice services primarily to U.S. residential and business customers, emphasizing high-speed data and fiber products. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience with a year-to-date gain of 18.93%, rebounding from prior lows within its 52-week range of $70.37 to $196.64. Q1 2026 results revealed revenue of $353 million, down 7.3% year-over-year and missing estimates, yet net income rose to $35.8 million from $2.6 million prior, aided by $90.6 million in debt repayment. Sentiment reflects cautious optimism from analysts' average price target of $106.75, supported by a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 8.18 and 9.01% dividend yield, though high debt-to-equity (210%) and negative ROE (return on equity, -19.87%) signal risks.

LBTYA Overview and Recent Performance

Liberty Global Ltd. (LBTYA) operates broadband internet, video, fixed-line telephony, and mobile services across Europe, including Belgium, Ireland, and Slovakia, with business solutions like cloud services. Recent market activity has been steadier, with a year-to-date return of 3.95% and one-year gain of 5.75% within a 52-week range of $9.03 to $13.52. Ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 1, developments include a bid for a London basketball franchise and a new CEO at subsidiary Liberty Blume, alongside presentations at industry conferences. Financials show trailing revenue of $4.88 billion but negative EPS (-20.86) and ROE (-63.11%), with debt-to-equity at 97.24%; analysts target $14.45 on average.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot among the 25 featured out of 351 total bots, boasting win rates from 51% to 88% and annualized returns up to +164%, such as a volatility bot at +164.21% across three tickers or semiconductor bots at 68-84% returns on 5-6 holdings. These bots employ real-time signals and risk management for momentum and sector rotation. Explore them to align with your trading style.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CABO and LBTYA share broadband exposure but diverge in scale and geography: CABO’s U.S.-centric model targets residential data/video amid fiber competition, while LBTYA leverages European mobile/fixed convergence for broader revenue streams. Growth drivers contrast with CABO emphasizing debt reduction and dividends versus LBTYA’s diversification into sports/media. Recent momentum favors CABO’s YTD surge, but LBTYA offers relative stability. Risks include high leverage for both (debt-to-equity over 97%) and negative profitability metrics, with CABO more volatile due to smaller cap. Market sentiment tilts toward CABO’s income potential in a yield-seeking environment, balanced by LBTYA’s international positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CABO based on superior recent momentum, including YTD outperformance and profitability gains in Q1 despite revenue softness, alongside attractive yield positioning. Factors like trend consistency and catalysts such as debt repayment bolster its relative appeal probabilistically over LBTYA’s steadier but lower-return profile ahead of earnings. This assessment reflects observable data patterns rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CABO vs. LBTYA commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CABO is a Buy and LBTYA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CABO: $40.93 vs. LBTYA: $11.02)
Brand notoriety: CABO and LBTYA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CABO: 143% vs. LBTYA: 124%
Market capitalization -- CABO: $232.19M vs. LBTYA: $3.69B
CABO [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $232.19M. LBTYA’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $217.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CABO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CABO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LBTYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CABO is a better buy in the long-term than LBTYA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CABO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CABO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LBTYA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CABO is a better buy in the short-term than LBTYA.

Price Growth

CABO (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -11.90% price change this week, while LBTYA (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -8.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CABO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-3.99% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBTYA($3.75B) has a higher market cap than CABO($248M). CABO has higher P/E ratio than LBTYA: CABO (101.55) vs LBTYA (2.00). LBTYA YTD gains are higher at: -1.032 vs. CABO (-63.731). CABO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 174M vs. LBTYA (-3.69B). LBTYA has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. CABO (166M). CABO has less debt than LBTYA: CABO (3.11B) vs LBTYA (9.16B). LBTYA has higher revenues than CABO: LBTYA (4.98B) vs CABO (1.47B).
CABOLBTYACABO / LBTYA
Capitalization248M3.75B7%
EBITDA174M-3.69B-5%
Gain YTD-63.731-1.0326,174%
P/E Ratio101.552.005,077%
Revenue1.47B4.98B30%
Total Cash166M1.88B9%
Total Debt3.11B9.16B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CABO vs LBTYA: Fundamental Ratings
CABO
LBTYA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
526
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CABO's Valuation (30) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBTYA (65). This means that CABO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.

CABO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBTYA (100). This means that CABO’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.

CABO's SMR Rating (96) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as LBTYA (99). This means that CABO’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.

LBTYA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CABO (92). This means that LBTYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CABO’s over the last 12 months.

CABO's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBTYA (65). This means that CABO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CABOLBTYA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CABO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LBTYA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TINS29.710.18
+0.60%
Templeton International Insights ETF
BCIL31.100.13
+0.41%
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
DNL46.650.07
+0.16%
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Gr ETF
SRLN40.33-0.05
-0.12%
State Street® Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
SPYQ185.65-1.63
-0.87%
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF

CABO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CABO has been loosely correlated with CHTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CABO jumps, then CHTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CABO
1D Price
Change %
CABO100%
-0.15%
CHTR - CABO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
LBRDK - CABO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
LBRDA - CABO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
LBTYK - CABO
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
CMCSA - CABO
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More

LBTYA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBTYA
1D Price
Change %
LBTYA100%
-1.56%
LBTYK - LBTYA
97%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
IDCC - LBTYA
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
S - LBTYA
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
LBTYB - LBTYA
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CABO - LBTYA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More