CACC
Price
$476.70
Change
-$6.44 (-1.33%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.79B
68 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$50.22
Change
+$0.62 (+1.25%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.02B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CACC vs OMF

Header iconCACC vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts CACC vs OMFBanner chart's image
Credit Acceptance
Price$476.70
Change-$6.44 (-1.33%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization6.79B
OneMain Holdings
Price$50.22
Change+$0.62 (+1.25%)
Volume$5.31K
Capitalization6.02B
CACC vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CACC vs. OMF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CACC is a Hold and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CACC: $483.14 vs. OMF: $49.60)
Brand notoriety: CACC and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CACC: 0% vs. OMF: 0%
Market capitalization -- CACC: $6.79B vs. OMF: $6.02B
CACC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $6.79B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CACC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CACC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than CACC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CACC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CACC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CACC is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

CACC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CACC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.23% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CACC($6.79B) has a higher market cap than OMF($6.02B). CACC has higher P/E ratio than OMF: CACC (24.75) vs OMF (9.44). CACC YTD gains are higher at: 2.914 vs. OMF (-1.018). CACC has less debt than OMF: CACC (5.07B) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than CACC: OMF (4.28B) vs CACC (1.88B).
CACCOMFCACC / OMF
Capitalization6.79B6.02B113%
EBITDA374MN/A-
Gain YTD2.914-1.018-286%
P/E Ratio24.759.44262%
Revenue1.88B4.28B44%
Total Cash13.2MN/A-
Total Debt5.07B19.8B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CACC vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
CACC
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5621
SMR RATING
1..100
506
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (69). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (56). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (50). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CACC (52). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to CACC’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACC (70). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACCOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CACC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVLH35.29N/A
N/A
Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF
IBDQ25.13N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corp ETF
VUSE60.11N/A
N/A
Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF
BDVG11.62N/A
N/A
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
GINN62.81-0.02
-0.04%
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF

CACC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CACC has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CACC jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CACC
1D Price
Change %
CACC100%
N/A
OMF - CACC
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
ALLY - CACC
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ENVA - CACC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
COF - CACC
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SYF - CACC
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
N/A
ENVA - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
COF - OMF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
AXP - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
SLM - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
DFS - OMF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More