Investors and traders focused on the government services and defense technology sectors often compare CACI and SAIC due to their overlapping exposure to U.S. federal contracts. Both firms deliver IT solutions, systems integration, and mission support primarily to defense and intelligence agencies. This comparison appeals to those evaluating relative performance, valuation differentials, and momentum shifts within a stable yet competitive industry segment amid ongoing government budget dynamics.
CACI International Inc. provides technology and engineering services to U.S. government customers, emphasizing national security and IT modernization. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited notable upward movement, supported by fiscal 2026 fourth-quarter and full-year results released in early August that included record revenues and contract awards totaling $10.2 billion. Additional catalysts include the opening of a manufacturing center of excellence and selection for Space Force technology architecture work. These developments contributed to improved sentiment and price appreciation over recent weeks.
Science Applications International Corporation delivers engineering, IT, and mission support services with a focus on defense, intelligence, and civilian government clients. Recent market activity has featured steady contract momentum, including a $400 million recompete award, alongside board-declared dividends and board additions. Shares have posted gains over the past quarter amid earnings outperformance and analyst upgrades, though price movements have been more measured compared to peers in the sector during the recent period.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the highest-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that collectively trade thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested results, and favorable risk-adjusted statistics earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, with many showcasing win rates above 60% in optimized scenarios and varying drawdown levels depending on market regime. Traders seeking automated signals tailored to stocks such as CACI or SAIC can explore the curated selection for data-driven insights.
CACI and SAIC share core exposure to U.S. government IT and defense contracts but differ in scale and growth trajectory. CACI maintains a larger market capitalization and has delivered higher recent revenue growth alongside expanded backlog. SAIC offers a more attractive valuation multiple and a dividend component that may appeal to income-oriented investors. Momentum has tilted toward CACI in recent weeks due to contract wins and earnings visibility, while SAIC benefits from lower volatility and steady recompete success. Risk factors for both include dependence on federal budgets and competitive bidding dynamics.
Based on observable factors including stronger recent price consistency, revenue expansion, and contract momentum, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probability of relative outperformance to CACI over the near term, though SAIC’s valuation and dividend profile provide a compelling alternative for diversified positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CACI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CACI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CACI (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while SAIC (@Information Technology Services) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.64%.
CACI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
SAIC is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| CACI | SAIC | CACI / SAIC | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 5.3B | 262% |
| EBITDA | 1.08B | 730M | 148% |
| Gain YTD | 18.241 | 26.989 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.08 | 14.75 | 177% |
| Revenue | 9.16B | 7.29B | 126% |
| Total Cash | 158M | 109M | 145% |
| Total Debt | 5.62B | 2.68B | 210% |
CACI | SAIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAIC's Valuation (14) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACI (56). This means that SAIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACI’s over the last 12 months.
CACI's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SAIC (59). This means that CACI’s stock grew similarly to SAIC’s over the last 12 months.
SAIC's SMR Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CACI (61). This means that SAIC’s stock grew similarly to CACI’s over the last 12 months.
CACI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SAIC (43). This means that CACI’s stock grew similarly to SAIC’s over the last 12 months.
CACI's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SAIC (32). This means that CACI’s stock grew similarly to SAIC’s over the last 12 months.
| CACI | SAIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% | 25 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACTS | 26.14 | 0.29 | +1.11% |
| FIS Tactical Equity ETF | |||
| EMXC | 99.25 | 0.58 | +0.59% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF | |||
| EQAL | 61.26 | 0.25 | +0.41% |
| Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| JULT | 48.73 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF | |||
| VIXY | 16.95 | -0.33 | -1.91% |
| ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures | |||