Government-focused IT services providers CACI and SAIC represent two established players in the defense and federal contracting space. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial results, valuation differences, and market positioning to assist institutional and individual investors evaluating relative opportunities in the sector. Traders monitoring government spending trends and earnings momentum may find the analysis particularly relevant for assessing how each company navigates similar macroeconomic and industry conditions.
CACI International Inc. delivers information technology, systems integration, and professional services primarily to U.S. government agencies, with emphasis on defense, intelligence, and national security missions. In its fiscal third quarter ended March 31, 2026, the company reported revenue of $2.4 billion, an 8.5% increase year-over-year, alongside adjusted diluted earnings per share of $7.27. Management raised fiscal 2026 revenue and EBITDA margin guidance following the release. Recent market activity has included post-earnings share price fluctuations amid broader sector movements, with the stock reflecting both the positive earnings surprise and subsequent profit-taking pressures observed in the ensuing weeks.
Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and mission-critical IT services to government and commercial clients, with a substantial portion tied to U.S. defense and intelligence programs. The company reported fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year 2026 results earlier in 2026, highlighting revenue of $7.26 billion for the year and continued focus on high-margin work. As of early June 2026, SAIC is poised to release its fiscal first-quarter 2027 earnings, with analyst expectations centered on revenue near $1.82 billion. Recent trading has shown measured movement ahead of the report, consistent with typical pre-earnings positioning in the government services space.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a broader library of hundreds that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend-following, volatility management, and risk-adjusted returns, earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse styles, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing win rates ranging from 55% to over 70% in backtested or live environments depending on the specific strategy. This resource allows traders to explore automated approaches tailored to individual risk tolerances and objectives.
CACI and SAIC share core exposure to federal IT contracting yet differ in scale and recent momentum. CACI’s larger revenue base and recent quarterly growth contrast with SAIC’s more compact operations and emphasis on operational efficiency. Valuation presents a clear trade-off, with SAIC offering a lower price-to-earnings multiple that may appeal to value-focused strategies, while CACI commands a premium potentially supported by stronger near-term growth indicators. Both face similar risk factors tied to government budget cycles and contract competition, though CACI’s recent guidance raise provides a near-term catalyst reference point ahead of SAIC’s upcoming report. Market sentiment remains broadly constructive for the sector, with relative performance hinging on execution and macroeconomic support for defense spending.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings momentum, guidance updates, and relative stability in trend metrics, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a probabilistic edge to CACI over SAIC. The assessment reflects CACI’s demonstrated revenue expansion and raised outlook in the most recent quarter, alongside consistent positioning within its peer group. This view remains subject to new data, including SAIC’s pending earnings release, and does not constitute investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CACI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAIC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CACI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAIC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CACI (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -11.40% price change this week, while SAIC (@Information Technology Services) price change was -8.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.79%.
CACI is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
SAIC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| CACI | SAIC | CACI / SAIC | |
| Capitalization | 9.94B | 4.25B | 234% |
| EBITDA | 1.08B | 730M | 148% |
| Gain YTD | -15.595 | 0.661 | -2,358% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.57 | 11.32 | 164% |
| Revenue | 9.16B | 7.29B | 126% |
| Total Cash | 158M | 109M | 145% |
| Total Debt | 5.62B | 2.68B | 210% |
CACI | SAIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 7 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAIC's Valuation (13) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CACI (55). This means that SAIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CACI’s over the last 12 months.
CACI's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SAIC (83). This means that CACI’s stock grew similarly to SAIC’s over the last 12 months.
SAIC's SMR Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CACI (62). This means that SAIC’s stock grew similarly to CACI’s over the last 12 months.
SAIC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CACI (63). This means that SAIC’s stock grew similarly to CACI’s over the last 12 months.
CACI's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SAIC (73). This means that CACI’s stock grew similarly to SAIC’s over the last 12 months.
| CACI | SAIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 65% | 13 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAIC has been loosely correlated with CACI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAIC jumps, then CACI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAIC | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| CACI - SAIC | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| PSN - SAIC | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.82% | ||
| GIB - SAIC | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| G - SAIC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| EXLS - SAIC | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
More | ||||