Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAFRX vs FCNSX
CAFRX vs FCNSX Comparison
Open Charts CAFRX vs FCNSX
CAFRX vs FCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAFRX vs. FCNSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAFRX is a Buy and FCNSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. CAFRX (7.26M). CAFRX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: CAFRX (3.72) vs FCNSX (1.21). CAFRX was incepted earlier than FCNSX: CAFRX (15 years) vs FCNSX (9 years). CAFRX (3.76) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CAFRX (1.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CAFRX: FCNSX (0) vs CAFRX (200). CAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.51 vs. FCNSX (17.06). CAFRX (67.08) and FCNSX (66.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CAFRX | FCNSX | CAFRX / FCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.699 | 5.772 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.26M | 10.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 1.21 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.51 | 17.06 | 237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.30 | 61.42 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.08 | 66.95 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement