Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAFRX vs FCNSX
CAFRX vs FCNSX Comparison
Open Charts CAFRX vs FCNSX
CAFRX vs FCNSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAFRX vs. FCNSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAFRX is a Hold and FCNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. CAFRX (7.24M). CAFRX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: CAFRX (3.75) vs FCNSX (1.23). CAFRX was incepted earlier than FCNSX: CAFRX (15 years) vs FCNSX (9 years). CAFRX (3.76) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). FCNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. CAFRX (1.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CAFRX: FCNSX (0) vs CAFRX (200). CAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.35 vs. FCNSX (18.33). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 74.23 vs. CAFRX (65.90).
| CAFRX | FCNSX | CAFRX / FCNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.577 | 8.810 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.24M | 9.91B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 1.23 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.35 | 18.33 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.46 | 59.58 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.90 | 74.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement