Ad is loading...
CAG
Price
$27.17
Change
+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
27 days until earnings call
HLF
Price
$8.50
Change
+$0.09 (+1.07%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CAG vs HLF

Header iconCAG vs HLF Comparison
Open Charts CAG vs HLFBanner chart's image
Conagra Brands
Price$27.17
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Volume$4.38M
CapitalizationN/A
Herbalife
Price$8.50
Change+$0.09 (+1.07%)
Volume$1.96M
CapitalizationN/A
CAG vs HLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAG vs. HLF commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a StrongSell and HLF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (CAG: $27.17 vs. HLF: $8.50)
Brand notoriety: CAG and HLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAG: 87% vs. HLF: 93%
Market capitalization -- CAG: $14.17B vs. HLF: $1B
CAG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.17B. HLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CAG and HLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLF is a better buy in the short-term than CAG.

Price Growth

CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.02% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +10.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAG is expected to report earnings on Dec 19, 2024.

HLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.89% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAG($14.2B) has a higher market cap than HLF($1B). CAG has higher P/E ratio than HLF: CAG (14.48) vs HLF (6.42). CAG YTD gains are higher at: -0.658 vs. HLF (-44.299). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. HLF (482M). HLF has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. CAG (61.5M). HLF has less debt than CAG: HLF (2.77B) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than HLF: CAG (12.2B) vs HLF (5.06B).
CAGHLFCAG / HLF
Capitalization14.2B1B1,416%
EBITDA1.88B482M390%
Gain YTD-0.658-44.2991%
P/E Ratio14.486.42226%
Revenue12.2B5.06B241%
Total Cash61.5M575M11%
Total Debt9.07B2.77B328%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAG vs HLF: Fundamental Ratings
CAG
HLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAG's Valuation (12) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (69) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAG (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CAG (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as HLF (25) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAGHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COTI.X0.1015220.006047
+6.33%
COTI cryptocurrency
OG.X4.9639070.166541
+3.47%
OG Fan Token cryptocurrency
NEO15.390.03
+0.20%
NeoGenomics
PPC52.250.04
+0.08%
Pilgrim's Pride Corp
LOOM.X0.065250-0.000783
-1.19%
Loom Network cryptocurrency

CAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAG
1D Price
Change %
CAG100%
+0.18%
GIS - CAG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CPB - CAG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
SJM - CAG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
KHC - CAG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
MDLZ - CAG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More

HLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLF
1D Price
Change %
HLF100%
+1.07%
USNA - HLF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
CENTA - HLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
CENT - HLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
CAG - HLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
FRPT - HLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
More