CAG
Price
$23.22
Change
+$0.22 (+0.96%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
14.17B
62 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$51.44
Change
+$0.60 (+1.18%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.38B
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CAG vs LW

Header iconCAG vs LW Comparison
Open Charts CAG vs LWBanner chart's image
Conagra Brands
Price$23.22
Change+$0.22 (+0.96%)
Volume$8.71M
Capitalization14.17B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$51.44
Change+$0.60 (+1.18%)
Volume$12.69K
Capitalization15.38B
CAG vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAG vs. LW commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a Buy and LW is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CAG: $23.22 vs. LW: $50.84)
Brand notoriety: CAG and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAG: 129% vs. LW: 52%
Market capitalization -- CAG: $14.17B vs. LW: $15.38B
CAG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.17B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than CAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than CAG.

Price Growth

CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.27% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than CAG($14.2B). CAG has higher P/E ratio than LW: CAG (14.48) vs LW (13.62). CAG YTD gains are higher at: -13.941 vs. LW (-22.920). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than CAG: LW (3.63B) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than LW: CAG (12.2B) vs LW (6.35B).
CAGLWCAG / LW
Capitalization14.2B15.4B92%
EBITDA1.88B1.34B140%
Gain YTD-13.941-22.92061%
P/E Ratio14.4813.62106%
Revenue12.2B6.35B192%
Total Cash61.5MN/A-
Total Debt9.07B3.63B250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAG vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
CAG
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAG's Valuation (8) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (84) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEAR.X2.7316420.448054
+19.62%
NEAR Protocol cryptocurrency
ZRX.X0.2803820.029271
+11.66%
0x Protocol cryptocurrency
STEEM.X0.1485430.009952
+7.18%
Steem cryptocurrency
OOKI.X0.0000470.000002
+3.62%
Ooki Protocol cryptocurrency
VOXEL.X0.0915300.001975
+2.21%
Voxies cryptocurrency

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-0.72%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
POST - LW
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-16.59%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More