CAG
Price
$19.40
Change
-$0.09 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.17B
82 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$51.32
Change
-$0.06 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAG vs LW

Header iconCAG vs LW Comparison
Open Charts CAG vs LWBanner chart's image
Conagra Brands
Price$19.40
Change-$0.09 (-0.46%)
Volume$20.16M
Capitalization14.17B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$51.32
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
Volume$2.33M
Capitalization15.38B
CAG vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAG vs. LW commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a Hold and LW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CAG: $19.40 vs. LW: $51.32)
Brand notoriety: CAG and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAG: 231% vs. LW: 123%
Market capitalization -- CAG: $14.17B vs. LW: $15.38B
CAG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.17B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than CAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than CAG.

Price Growth

CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -7.58% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.61% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than CAG($14.2B). CAG has higher P/E ratio than LW: CAG (14.48) vs LW (13.62). LW YTD gains are higher at: -22.192 vs. CAG (-28.099). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. LW (1.34B). LW has less debt than CAG: LW (3.63B) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than LW: CAG (12.2B) vs LW (6.35B).
CAGLWCAG / LW
Capitalization14.2B15.4B92%
EBITDA1.88B1.34B140%
Gain YTD-28.099-22.192127%
P/E Ratio14.4813.62106%
Revenue12.2B6.35B192%
Total Cash61.5MN/A-
Total Debt9.07B3.63B250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAG vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
CAG
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8542
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9910
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAG's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (35) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (85) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as CAG (65) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAG (99) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NATO36.090.12
+0.33%
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
XBOC31.950.02
+0.05%
Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF™ Oct
ESMV28.86N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Optd MSCI USA Min Vol FacETF
IGEB44.95-0.20
-0.44%
iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF
TDF9.90-0.09
-0.90%
Templeton Dragon Fund

CAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAG
1D Price
Change %
CAG100%
-0.46%
GIS - CAG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
CPB - CAG
73%
Closely correlated
+2.46%
KHC - CAG
67%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
FLO - CAG
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
MKC - CAG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-0.12%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
POST - LW
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
THS - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
INGR - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
BYND - LW
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More