Advertisement
CAH vs EDAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAH is a Hold and EDAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEDAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CAH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EDAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- EDAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CAH (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while EDAP (@Medical Distributors) price change was +9.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAH is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
EDAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (+0.30% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
| CAH | EDAP | CAH / EDAP | |
| Capitalization | 35.7B | 50.9M | 70,138% |
| EBITDA | 3.03B | -19.67M | -15,376% |
| Gain YTD | 27.899 | -38.462 | -73% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.20 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 222B | 62.8M | 353,503% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 22.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 7.68B | 9.08M | 84,589% |
CAH | EDAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 49 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAH's Valuation (69) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as EDAP (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Medical Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew significantly faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
EDAP's SMR Rating (97) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CAH (99) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that EDAP’s stock grew similarly to CAH’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EDAP (92) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew somewhat faster than EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAH's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as EDAP (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CAH’s stock grew similarly to EDAP’s over the last 12 months.
| CAH | EDAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 45% | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WEAT | 4.22 | 0.02 | +0.48% |
| Teucrium Wheat Fund | |||
| TECB | 58.59 | 0.24 | +0.41% |
| iShares US Tech Breakthrough Mltsctr ETF | |||
| BSCP | 20.73 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TMB | 25.47 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | |||
| UCC | 49.53 | -0.35 | -0.71% |
| ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary | |||
CAH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAH has been loosely correlated with COR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAH jumps, then COR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAH | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| COR - CAH | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MCK - CAH | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| SHTDF - CAH | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| HSIC - CAH | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| EDAP - CAH | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
EDAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EDAP and AORT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EDAP and AORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAP | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| AORT - EDAP | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| AVNS - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| SRDX - EDAP | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| UFPT - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.99% | ||
| SENS - EDAP | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||