Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAIBX vs KTRAX
CAIBX vs KTRAX Comparison
Open Charts CAIBX vs KTRAX
CAIBX vs KTRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAIBX vs. KTRAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAIBX is a Buy and KTRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAIBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. KTRAX (633M). KTRAX pays higher dividends than CAIBX: KTRAX (4.09) vs CAIBX (2.75). CAIBX was incepted earlier than KTRAX: CAIBX (39 years) vs KTRAX (62 years). KTRAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CAIBX (0.58). KTRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. CAIBX (50.00). CAIBX (6%) and KTRAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. CAIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTRAX: CAIBX (250) vs KTRAX (1000). KTRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. CAIBX (10.43). CAIBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.62 vs. KTRAX (6.99).
| CAIBX | KTRAX | CAIBX / KTRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 62 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.456 | 9.145 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 633M | 20,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 4.09 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.43 | 12.79 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.38 | 22.69 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.62 | 6.99 | 538% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.16 | 53.71 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement