This comparison examines CAL and GAP to highlight distinctions in business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning within the consumer retail space. Investors and traders evaluating exposure to apparel and footwear segments may find the analysis relevant for assessing relative opportunities in a sector influenced by macroeconomic conditions and consumer sentiment. The review draws on observable metrics and developments to support informed decision-making without projecting future outcomes.
Caleres, Inc. designs, sources, and distributes footwear through owned brands and wholesale channels across domestic and international markets. The company maintains a portfolio focused on comfort and fashion segments. In recent weeks, CAL shares have reflected mixed retail sector dynamics, with price movements influenced by quarterly results and broader consumer discretionary trends. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing efforts to optimize inventory and e-commerce channels amid variable demand patterns.
Gap, Inc. operates a portfolio of apparel brands including Gap, Old Navy, Banana Republic, and Athleta, with a significant presence in North America and select international markets. The company focuses on omnichannel retail strategies. Recent market activity for GAP has been influenced by brand-specific initiatives and sector headwinds such as import costs. Performance has aligned with apparel retail peers, showing responsiveness to earnings updates and macroeconomic signals without notable divergence.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, including consistent risk-adjusted returns and alignment with current volatility levels, earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of historical win rates, drawdown profiles, and trade frequencies, allowing users to explore options tailored to different risk tolerances and objectives. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and backtested results.
CAL and GAP both operate in consumer cyclicals but differ in product focus and scale. CAL emphasizes footwear specialization with wholesale exposure, potentially offering narrower but targeted growth drivers, while GAP leverages brand diversification across apparel categories for broader revenue streams. Recent momentum has favored stability in larger-cap retail names like GAP due to analyst coverage, whereas CAL has shown greater price sensitivity to company-specific news. Sector exposure overlaps in discretionary spending risks, yet GAP carries additional considerations from multi-brand operations and international presence. Market sentiment remains neutral overall, with trade-offs centered on diversification versus niche positioning.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning within the retail sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently indicate a probabilistic preference for GAP due to its broader brand portfolio and sustained analyst attention, which may support more stable price behavior compared to CAL. This assessment reflects current data patterns rather than guarantees of future performance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -9.89% price change this week, while GAP (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -6.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.
CAL is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
GAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
| CAL | GAP | CAL / GAP | |
| Capitalization | 426M | 7.42B | 6% |
| EBITDA | 85M | 1.91B | 4% |
| Gain YTD | 5.311 | -18.381 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.77 | 8.18 | 205% |
| Revenue | 2.81B | 15.4B | 18% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.56B | - |
| Total Debt | 891M | 5.64B | 16% |
CAL | GAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 8 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAL's Valuation (13) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GAP (16) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to GAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GAP (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to GAP’s over the last 12 months.
GAP's SMR Rating (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAL (92) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that GAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAL’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GAP (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to GAP’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAP (63) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAP’s over the last 12 months.
| CAL | GAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 80% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FEXRX | 16.16 | 0.22 | +1.38% |
| First Eagle U.S. SMID Cap Opportunity R6 | |||
| APHMX | 44.92 | 0.22 | +0.49% |
| Artisan Mid Cap Institutional | |||
| RIIEX | 49.96 | 0.20 | +0.40% |
| American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R2E | |||
| PIGCX | 33.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam International Equity C | |||
| BOPIX | 28.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Sterling Capital Special Opps Inst | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAL has been closely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAL jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAL | 100% | -3.58% | ||
| DBI - CAL | 67% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| SHOE - CAL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| SHOO - CAL | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| ZUMZ - CAL | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| GAP - CAL | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAP has been loosely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAP jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAP | 100% | -2.51% | ||
| DBI - GAP | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| BKE - GAP | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| URBN - GAP | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| CAL - GAP | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| SHOE - GAP | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||