CANG
Price
$1.40
Change
-$0.03 (-2.10%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
57.43M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMR
Price
$9.68
Change
+$0.12 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
27.73B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs NMR

CANG vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. NMR commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Buy and NMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CANG: $1.40 vs. NMR: $9.68)
Brand notoriety: CANG and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 70% vs. NMR: 66%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $57.43M vs. NMR: $27.73B
CANG [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $57.43M. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $27.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than CANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the short-term than NMR.

Price Growth

CANG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -17.16% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

NMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.01% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($27.7B) has a higher market cap than CANG($57.4M). NMR (11.86) and CANG (11.51) have similar P/E ratio . NMR YTD gains are higher at: 15.375 vs. CANG (-90.667). CANG has less debt than NMR: CANG (32.7M) vs NMR (19.07T). NMR has higher revenues than CANG: NMR (1.98T) vs CANG (646M).
CANGNMRCANG / NMR
Capitalization57.4M27.7B0%
EBITDA-659.81MN/A-
Gain YTD-90.66715.375-590%
P/E Ratio11.5111.8697%
Revenue646M1.98T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.7M19.07T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8795
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
1003
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3619
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (69) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (3) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CANG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CANG (96) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CANG’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CANG (36) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to CANG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VG13.380.14
+1.06%
Venture Global Inc
CON31.650.03
+0.09%
Concentra Group Holdings Parent Inc
HIPO31.45-0.43
-1.35%
Hippo Holdings
WYHG3.64-0.25
-6.43%
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited
DEFT0.40-0.03
-6.48%
DEFI Technologies Inc

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANG and MARA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANG and MARA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-2.10%
MARA - CANG
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
CIFR - CANG
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
BMNR - CANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.42%
XP - CANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
NMR - CANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+1.26%
MS - NMR
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
GS - NMR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
MCO - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
RJF - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
NDAQ - NMR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More