CARG
Price
$37.50
Change
+$0.48 (+1.30%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.72B
44 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$56.30
Change
-$1.08 (-1.88%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.41B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARG vs RUSHA

Header iconCARG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts CARG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
CarGurus
Price$37.50
Change+$0.48 (+1.30%)
Volume$667.81K
Capitalization3.72B
Rush Enterprises
Price$56.30
Change-$1.08 (-1.88%)
Volume$330.28K
Capitalization4.41B
CARG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CARG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARG vs. RUSHA commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CARG: $37.50 vs. RUSHA: $56.30)
Brand notoriety: CARG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARG: 60% vs. RUSHA: 94%
Market capitalization -- CARG: $3.72B vs. RUSHA: $4.41B
CARG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $3.72B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CARG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than CARG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than CARG.

Price Growth

CARG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.64% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.41B) has a higher market cap than CARG($3.72B). CARG has higher P/E ratio than RUSHA: CARG (30.00) vs RUSHA (16.04). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 3.819 vs. CARG (2.627). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. CARG (213M). CARG has more cash in the bank: 231M vs. RUSHA (211M). CARG has less debt than RUSHA: CARG (195M) vs RUSHA (1.75B). RUSHA has higher revenues than CARG: RUSHA (7.69B) vs CARG (919M).
CARGRUSHACARG / RUSHA
Capitalization3.72B4.41B84%
EBITDA213M682M31%
Gain YTD2.6273.81969%
P/E Ratio30.0016.04187%
Revenue919M7.69B12%
Total Cash231M211M109%
Total Debt195M1.75B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
CARG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
304
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7319
SMR RATING
1..100
3357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (73) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RUSHA (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CARG (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRSVX21.220.20
+0.95%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R6
SBASX12.800.12
+0.95%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
CCASX70.130.45
+0.65%
Conestoga Small Cap Investors
ERIFX12.640.03
+0.24%
Eaton Vance Balanced R
RNNEX69.53-0.10
-0.14%
American Funds New Economy R2E

CARG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARG has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARG
1D Price
Change %
CARG100%
+1.30%
AN - CARG
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
MAX - CARG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
RUSHA - CARG
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
SAH - CARG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
ABG - CARG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-1.88%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
AN - RUSHA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
GPI - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More