CARG
Price
$35.89
Change
-$0.13 (-0.36%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUSHA
Price
$52.29
Change
+$0.48 (+0.93%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.05B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARG vs RUSHA

Header iconCARG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts CARG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
CarGurus
Price$35.89
Change-$0.13 (-0.36%)
Volume$954.36K
Capitalization3.43B
Rush Enterprises
Price$52.29
Change+$0.48 (+0.93%)
Volume$772.92K
Capitalization4.05B
CARG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
CARG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARG vs. RUSHA commentary
Nov 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARG is a StrongBuy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CARG: $35.89 vs. RUSHA: $52.31)
Brand notoriety: CARG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARG: 96% vs. RUSHA: 124%
Market capitalization -- CARG: $3.43B vs. RUSHA: $4.05B
CARG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $3.43B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CARG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than CARG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CARG and RUSHA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CARG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARG is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+2.64% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.05B) has a higher market cap than CARG($3.43B). CARG has higher P/E ratio than RUSHA: CARG (24.25) vs RUSHA (15.52). CARG YTD gains are higher at: -1.779 vs. RUSHA (-3.170). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 664M vs. CARG (213M). CARG has less debt than RUSHA: CARG (195M) vs RUSHA (1.75B). RUSHA has higher revenues than CARG: RUSHA (7.67B) vs CARG (919M).
CARGRUSHACARG / RUSHA
Capitalization3.43B4.05B85%
EBITDA213M664M32%
Gain YTD-1.779-3.17056%
P/E Ratio24.2515.52156%
Revenue919M7.67B12%
Total Cash231MN/A-
Total Debt195M1.75B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
CARG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7026
SMR RATING
1..100
3375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9946
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (84) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (70) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUSHA (75) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

CARG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RUSHA (59) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CARG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARG (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEFFX78.400.74
+0.95%
American Funds New Economy F2
ROFRX14.600.12
+0.83%
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity R
DIERX46.19N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity I
FVDFX38.90N/A
N/A
Fidelity Value Discovery
TARZX26.27N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z

CARG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARG has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARG
1D Price
Change %
CARG100%
-0.36%
AN - CARG
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
LAD - CARG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
MAX - CARG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
ABG - CARG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
RUSHA - CARG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
More