Advertisement
CARS vs SEAT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARS is a StrongBuy and SEAT is a Buy.
| CARS | SEAT | CARS / SEAT | |
| Capitalization | 627M | 52.8M | 1,188% |
| EBITDA | 158M | -411.55M | -38% |
| Gain YTD | -4.016 | -35.090 | 11% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.54 | 46.50 | 44% |
| Revenue | 726M | 519M | 140% |
| Total Cash | 33.3M | 137M | 24% |
| Total Debt | 447M | 401M | 111% |
CARS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CARS | SEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 13 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CARS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SEAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CARS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CARS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CARS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SEAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CARS (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while SEAT (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -22.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CARS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
SEAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-1.80% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
CARS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARS has been loosely correlated with ARKO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CARS jumps, then ARKO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CARS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARS | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| ARKO - CARS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ARHS - CARS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| HNST - CARS | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| CPRT - CARS | 51% Loosely correlated | +5.94% | ||
| PAG - CARS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
SEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAT has been loosely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAT jumps, then Z could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAT | 100% | -5.45% | ||
| Z - SEAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| ZG - SEAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| TEAD - SEAT | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPLI - SEAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.89% | ||
| CARS - SEAT | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||