CATY
Price
$58.22
Change
+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNFP
Price
$96.31
Change
-$0.08 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs PNFP

Header iconCATY vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts CATY vs PNFPBanner chart's image
CATY vs PNFP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CATY vs. PNFP commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a StrongBuy and PNFP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2026
Stock price -- (CATY: $58.22 vs. PNFP: $96.31)
Brand notoriety: CATY and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 86% vs. PNFP: 83%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $3.9B vs. PNFP: $14.55B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.9B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($14.6B) has a higher market cap than CATY($3.9B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than CATY: PNFP (13.39) vs CATY (12.00). CATY YTD gains are higher at: 21.997 vs. PNFP (1.962). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. CATY (146M). CATY has less debt than PNFP: CATY (173M) vs PNFP (2.2B). PNFP has higher revenues than CATY: PNFP (1.74B) vs CATY (845M).
CATYPNFPCATY / PNFP
Capitalization3.9B14.6B27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.9971.9621,121%
P/E Ratio12.0013.3990%
Revenue845M1.74B49%
Total Cash146M295M49%
Total Debt173M2.2B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2578
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3585
SMR RATING
1..100
3120
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CATY's Valuation (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (64). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (85). This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CATY (31). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (55). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (74). This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNFP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBGJ1.140.21
+22.29%
Li Bang International Corporation Inc.
KD11.62-0.52
-4.28%
Kyndryl Holdings
CPS29.32-1.57
-5.08%
Cooper-Standard Automotive
BMEA1.27-0.10
-7.30%
Biomea Fusion
RMBS145.29-24.06
-14.21%
Rambus

CATY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATY has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATY jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CATY
1D Price
Change %
CATY100%
+0.07%
UCB - CATY
89%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
UBSI - CATY
88%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
ONB - CATY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
FRME - CATY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
FULT - CATY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
More