CAVA vs EATZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a StrongBuy and EATZ is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.92% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAVA is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (+2.81% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| CAVA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
CAVA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with WING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then WING could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAVA | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| WING - CAVA | 51% Loosely correlated | +14.56% | ||
| SG - CAVA | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| SHAK - CAVA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| EAT - CAVA | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| CAKE - CAVA | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||
EATZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EATZ has been loosely correlated with PFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EATZ jumps, then PFGC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EATZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EATZ | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| PFGC - EATZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CAVA - EATZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| PTLO - EATZ | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| BROS - EATZ | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| NATH - EATZ | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||