Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBALX vs RLBCX
CBALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBALX vs RLBCX
Columbia Balanced Inst
Price$55.07
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.06B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
CBALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBALX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. CBALX (10.1B). CBALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CBALX (1.90) vs RLBCX (1.57). CBALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBALX (34 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CBALX (0.68). CBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBALX: RLBCX (250) vs CBALX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. CBALX (7.98). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. CBALX (31.27).
| CBALX | RLBCX | CBALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.476 | 8.830 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 254B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 9.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.60 | 33.65 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 37.80 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.46 | 62.13 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement