Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBALX vs RLBCX
CBALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CBALX vs RLBCX
CBALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBALX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. CBALX (10.5B). CBALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CBALX (1.74) vs RLBCX (1.52). CBALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CBALX (35 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CBALX (0.66). CBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBALX: RLBCX (250) vs CBALX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.31 vs. CBALX (14.27). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. CBALX (20.93).
| CBALX | RLBCX | CBALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.89 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.89 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.769 | 9.550 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 279B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.52 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 17.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.14 | 44.11 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 33.59 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | 82.12 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement