Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBALX vs RLBEX
CBALX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts CBALX vs RLBEX
CBALX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBALX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBALX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. CBALX (10.5B). RLBEX (1.77) and CBALX (1.74) have matching dividends . CBALX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: CBALX (35 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). CBALX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). CBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBALX: RLBEX (250) vs CBALX (2000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.71 vs. CBALX (14.27). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.34 vs. CBALX (20.93).
| CBALX | RLBEX | CBALX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.60 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.769 | 9.691 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 279B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 17.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.14 | 45.48 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 35.34 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | 88.34 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement