Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBALX vs RLBFX
CBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBALX vs RLBFX
CBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBALX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. CBALX (10.5B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBALX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CBALX (1.74). CBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBALX (35 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBALX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBALX: RLBFX (250) vs CBALX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. CBALX (14.27). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.10 vs. CBALX (20.93).
| CBALX | RLBFX | CBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.30 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.30 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.769 | 9.817 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 279B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 2.02 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 18.07 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.14 | 46.81 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 37.10 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | 89.73 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement