Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBALX vs RLBFX
CBALX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBALX vs RLBFX
CBALX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBALX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBALX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CBALX (10.3B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBALX: RLBFX (2.02) vs CBALX (1.74). CBALX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBALX (35 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBALX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBALX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBALX: RLBFX (250) vs CBALX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. CBALX (11.27). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. CBALX (18.18).
| CBALX | RLBFX | CBALX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.30 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.30 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.477 | 8.410 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 2.02 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 15.22 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 44.11 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.18 | 35.80 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.93 | 91.66 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement