Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs FFMMX
CBEAX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs FFMMX
CBEAX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. FFMMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and FFMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CBEAX (150M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: FFMMX (1.63) vs CBEAX (0.70). CBEAX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CBEAX (22 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CBEAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: FFMMX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). FFMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. CBEAX (-2.07). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. CBEAX (-31.17).
| CBEAX | FFMMX | CBEAX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.36 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.36 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.872 | 8.977 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.63 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.07 | 5.42 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.00 | 37.83 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.17 | 39.64 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement