Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CBEAX (152M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs CBEAX (0.72). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBEAX (0.85). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMEBX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. CBEAX (4.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. CBEAX (-31.37).
| CBEAX | RMEBX | CBEAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.414 | 6.444 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.04 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 10.14 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.39 | 34.54 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.37 | 35.62 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.21 | 94.57 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers