Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CBEAX (154M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs CBEAX (0.70). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBEAX (0.84). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMEBX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. CBEAX (4.84). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. CBEAX (-30.57).
| CBEAX | RMEBX | CBEAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.718 | 9.416 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 8.96 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.55 | 32.63 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.57 | 36.13 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.60 | 90.64 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers