Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMEBX
CBEAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CBEAX (150M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs CBEAX (0.70). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CBEAX (0.84). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMEBX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. CBEAX (-2.07). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. CBEAX (-31.17).
| CBEAX | RMEBX | CBEAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.872 | 8.448 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.99 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.07 | 4.65 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.00 | 34.88 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.17 | 34.68 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.33 | 92.45 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers