Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
Price$11.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.7M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CBEAX (160M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.24) vs CBEAX (0.63). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBEAX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. CBEAX (-16.27). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.18 vs. CBEAX (-7.37).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.614 | 12.931 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.24 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.27 | 7.10 | -229% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.17 | 34.09 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.37 | 60.18 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.30 | 96.26 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement