Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
Price$10.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.5M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. CBEAX (155M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.26) vs CBEAX (0.65). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBEAX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. CBEAX (-16.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.97 vs. CBEAX (-11.45).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.008 | 9.891 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.26 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.23 | 9.82 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.68 | 25.99 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.45 | 54.97 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.12 | 78.66 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement