Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
Price$10.72
Change+$0.11 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.58M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. CBEAX (153M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.31) vs CBEAX (0.67). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBEAX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. CBEAX (-15.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. CBEAX (-1.58).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.206 | 7.403 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.89 | 9.64 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.06 | 26.42 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.58 | 63.87 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.99 | 76.11 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement