Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value CL A
Price$10.87
Change-$0.05 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.92B
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CBEAX (157M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs CBEAX (0.66). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBEAX (0.91) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. CBEAX (-17.39). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. CBEAX (-6.36).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.91 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.309 | 9.578 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.27 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.39 | 8.23 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.02 | 31.78 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.36 | 57.17 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.48 | 76.07 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement