Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CBEAX (155M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.15) vs CBEAX (0.70). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBEAX (0.84). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. CBEAX (3.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. CBEAX (-30.09).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.079 | 10.454 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.15 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.93 | 9.14 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.80 | 38.82 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.09 | 36.70 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.62 | 92.27 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers