Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFCX
CBEAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CBEAX (153M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFCX (1.16) vs CBEAX (0.71). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBEAX (0.84). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFCX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. CBEAX (2.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. CBEAX (-30.99).
| CBEAX | RMFCX | CBEAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.969 | 9.137 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.16 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 8.88 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.94 | 34.84 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.99 | 37.23 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.96 | 91.06 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement