Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBEAX vs RMFEX
CBEAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CBEAX vs RMFEX
CBEAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBEAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBEAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CBEAX (154M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CBEAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs CBEAX (0.70). CBEAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CBEAX (22 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CBEAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). CBEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBEAX: RMFEX (250) vs CBEAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. CBEAX (4.84). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.25 vs. CBEAX (-30.57).
| CBEAX | RMFEX | CBEAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.62 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.62 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.718 | 9.694 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 9.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.55 | 34.42 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.57 | 39.25 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.60 | 100.56 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement