CBFV
Price
$32.07
Change
-$0.65 (-1.99%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
159.89M
15 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$45.63
Change
+$0.20 (+0.44%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
204.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs FRAF

Header iconCBFV vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs FRAFBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.07
Change-$0.65 (-1.99%)
Volume$6.8K
Capitalization159.89M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$45.63
Change+$0.20 (+0.44%)
Volume$10.72K
Capitalization204.27M
CBFV vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. FRAF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and FRAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.07 vs. FRAF: $45.63)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 52% vs. FRAF: 61%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $159.89M vs. FRAF: $204.27M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $159.89M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $204.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBFV and FRAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.43% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($204M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($160M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: CBFV (14.99) vs FRAF (13.91). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 56.559 vs. CBFV (15.029). CBFV has less debt than FRAF: CBFV (34.7M) vs FRAF (224M). FRAF has higher revenues than CBFV: FRAF (76.1M) vs CBFV (49.3M).
CBFVFRAFCBFV / FRAF
Capitalization160M204M78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.02956.55927%
P/E Ratio14.9913.91108%
Revenue49.3M76.1M65%
Total CashN/A23.3M-
Total Debt34.7M224M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8271
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1614
SMR RATING
1..100
5951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (64). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (16). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (49). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (16). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTLRF1.70N/A
N/A
Metalore Resources Limited
NINOF11.30N/A
N/A
Nikon Corp.
RSNHF10.01N/A
N/A
Resona Holdings, Inc.
MXLLF12.76N/A
N/A
MAXELL LTD.
NRRSF0.64-0.01
-1.71%
Norsemont Mining Inc.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.99%
WNEB - CBFV
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
FRAF - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FUNC - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
MRBK - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
BVFL - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with MRBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then MRBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.44%
MRBK - FRAF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
WNEB - FRAF
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
FUNC - FRAF
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CWBC - FRAF
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
UBFO - FRAF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
More