CBFV
Price
$37.24
Change
-$0.08 (-0.21%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
189.24M
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WNEB
Price
$13.96
Change
+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
279.84M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs WNEB

CBFV vs WNEB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. WNEB commentary
Aug 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and WNEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2026
Stock price -- (CBFV: $37.24 vs. WNEB: $13.96)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and WNEB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 47% vs. WNEB: 31%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $189.24M vs. WNEB: $279.84M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.24M. WNEB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $279.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWNEB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WNEB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than WNEB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WNEB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WNEB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WNEB is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while WNEB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

WNEB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WNEB($280M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($189M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than WNEB: CBFV (27.18) vs WNEB (16.82). WNEB YTD gains are higher at: 12.319 vs. CBFV (9.561). CBFV has less debt than WNEB: CBFV (34.8M) vs WNEB (117M). WNEB has higher revenues than CBFV: WNEB (88.2M) vs CBFV (46.1M).
CBFVWNEBCBFV / WNEB
Capitalization189M280M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.56112.31978%
P/E Ratio27.1816.82162%
Revenue46.1M88.2M52%
Total CashN/A22.2M-
Total Debt34.8M117M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs WNEB: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
WNEB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1327
SMR RATING
1..100
8274
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WNEB's Valuation (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WNEB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WNEB (27) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to WNEB’s over the last 12 months.

WNEB's SMR Rating (74) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WNEB’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WNEB (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to WNEB’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WNEB (66) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than WNEB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVWNEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WNEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZESX15.06N/A
N/A
Lazard International Equity Select Open
FIRCX9.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate C
NGDRX31.97N/A
N/A
Neuberger Large Cap Growth R3
PQSIX54.30N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index R6
GQLIX37.21N/A
N/A
GMO Quality I

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+0.35%
WNEB - CBFV
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
FSBW - CBFV
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
HTB - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.36%
CCNE - CBFV
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
MBWM - CBFV
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More