CBFV
Price
$32.07
Change
-$0.65 (-1.99%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
159.89M
15 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$36.54
Change
+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
237.31M
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs FUNC

Header iconCBFV vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs FUNCBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.07
Change-$0.65 (-1.99%)
Volume$6.8K
Capitalization159.89M
First United
Price$36.54
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
Volume$17.57K
Capitalization237.31M
CBFV vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. FUNC commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Hold and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.07 vs. FUNC: $36.54)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 52% vs. FUNC: 86%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $159.89M vs. FUNC: $237.31M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $159.89M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $237.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.43% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($237M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($160M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: CBFV (14.99) vs FUNC (10.01). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 15.029 vs. FUNC (10.694). CBFV has less debt than FUNC: CBFV (34.7M) vs FUNC (151M). FUNC has higher revenues than CBFV: FUNC (83.7M) vs CBFV (49.3M).
CBFVFUNCCBFV / FUNC
Capitalization160M237M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.02910.694141%
P/E Ratio14.9910.01150%
Revenue49.3M83.7M59%
Total CashN/A82.8M-
Total Debt34.7M151M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1626
SMR RATING
1..100
5944
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8511

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (64). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (26). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (59). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (49). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUNC (84). This means that CBFV’s stock grew significantly faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTLRF1.70N/A
N/A
Metalore Resources Limited
NINOF11.30N/A
N/A
Nikon Corp.
RSNHF10.01N/A
N/A
Resona Holdings, Inc.
MXLLF12.76N/A
N/A
MAXELL LTD.
NRRSF0.64-0.01
-1.71%
Norsemont Mining Inc.

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.99%
WNEB - CBFV
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
FRAF - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FUNC - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
MRBK - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
BVFL - CBFV
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with CWBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then CWBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.14%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
SHBI - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
HTBK - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
More