CBFV
Price
$32.88
Change
-$0.24 (-0.72%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
165.12M
13 days until earnings call
TRUX
Price
$81.55
Change
+$0.17 (+0.21%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
233.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs TRUX

Header iconCBFV vs TRUX Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs TRUXBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$32.88
Change-$0.24 (-0.72%)
Volume$200
Capitalization165.12M
Truxton
Price$81.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.21%)
Volume$238
Capitalization233.87M
CBFV vs TRUX Comparison Chart in %
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. TRUX commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a StrongBuy and TRUX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $32.75 vs. TRUX: $82.00)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and TRUX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 38% vs. TRUX: 56%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $165.12M vs. TRUX: $233.87M
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $165.12M. TRUX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $233.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRUX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than TRUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the short-term than TRUX.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while TRUX (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.25% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRUX($234M) has a higher market cap than CBFV($165M). CBFV has higher P/E ratio than TRUX: CBFV (15.30) vs TRUX (12.93). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 17.468 vs. TRUX (14.694). CBFV (49.3M) and TRUX (47.5M) have equivalent revenues.
CBFVTRUXCBFV / TRUX
Capitalization165M234M71%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.46814.694119%
P/E Ratio15.3012.93118%
Revenue49.3M47.5M104%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt34.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs TRUX: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
TRUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1516
SMR RATING
1..100
5942
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (66) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (71) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (16) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TRUX's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CBFV (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TRUX’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TRUX (52) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRUX (45) in the null industry. This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVTRUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNNEF1.700.03
+1.80%
Canacol Energy Ltd.
XXMMF0.10N/A
N/A
XIMEN MINING CORP
DCHIY1.72N/A
N/A
Digital China Holdings Ltd.
ACOPY5.71-0.02
-0.35%
The A2 Milk Co Ltd.
GXYEF5.01-0.29
-5.47%
Galaxy Entertainment Group, Ltd.

TRUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRUX and MNBO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRUX and MNBO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUX
1D Price
Change %
TRUX100%
+0.55%
MNBO - TRUX
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFGP - TRUX
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
WCFB - TRUX
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - TRUX
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
TKGBY - TRUX
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
More