Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBGAX vs NMFIX
CBGAX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts CBGAX vs NMFIX
CBGAX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFIX has more cash in the bank: 985M vs. CBGAX (169M). NMFIX pays higher dividends than CBGAX: NMFIX (2.29) vs CBGAX (1.86). CBGAX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: CBGAX (4 years) vs NMFIX (14 years). CBGAX (2.22) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.03). NMFIX (70.72) and CBGAX (68.00) have comparable annual turnover. CBGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMFIX: CBGAX (1000) vs NMFIX (2500). CBGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.00 vs. NMFIX (12.95).
| CBGAX | NMFIX | CBGAX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.98 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.03 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.335 | 8.488 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 985M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 2.29 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.00 | 12.95 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.63 | 35.45 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 23.65 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers