Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBGAX vs RGFTX
CBGAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CBGAX vs RGFTX
CBGAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 592M vs. CBGAX (168M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CBGAX: RGFTX (2.68) vs CBGAX (2.34). CBGAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CBGAX (4 years) vs RGFTX (10 years). CBGAX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). RGFTX (71.00) and CBGAX (68.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBGAX: RGFTX (0) vs CBGAX (1000). CBGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. RGFTX (2.68).
| CBGAX | RGFTX | CBGAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.91 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.22 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.154 | 6.771 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 168M | 592M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 2.68 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.62 | 2.68 | 546% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 38.58 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 17.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement