Ad is loading...
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.57B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.76
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.06M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.57B vs. PFATX (458M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHIX (4.62) vs PFATX (2.98). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (12 years) vs PFATX (17 years). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CBHIX (87.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.34 vs. PFATX (-3.07). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 7.52 vs. PFATX (-3.61).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.901 | 1.704 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 458M | 561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.62 | 2.98 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.34 | -3.07 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.65 | 0.61 | -107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.52 | -3.61 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.51 | -7.30 | -336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...