Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.93M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.6B vs. PFATX (426M). PFATX pays higher dividends than CBHIX: PFATX (5.23) vs CBHIX (4.24). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PFATX (17 years). PFATX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 443.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.16 vs. PFATX (-2.54). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.64 vs. PFATX (5.50).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.33 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.447 | 2.095 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 426M | 610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.24 | 5.23 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | -2.54 | -321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.94 | -3.42 | -144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.64 | 5.50 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.11 | -7.06 | -426% |