Ad is loading...
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.06M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. PFATX (463M). PFATX pays higher dividends than CBHIX: PFATX (4.99) vs CBHIX (4.26). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (12 years) vs PFATX (17 years). PFATX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 443.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. PFATX (-5.52). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.77 vs. PFATX (6.08).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.33 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.263 | 1.962 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 463M | 540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.26 | 4.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -5.52 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.06 | 2.03 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.77 | 6.08 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.23 | -7.44 | -379% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...