Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.72
Change-$0.08 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets421.08M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a StrongBuy and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. PFATX (421M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHIX (4.55) vs PFATX (3.98). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PFATX (17 years). PFATX (1.33) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. PFATX (-0.34). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 10.81 vs. CBHIX (9.48).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.33 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.353 | 3.690 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 421M | 635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 3.98 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | -0.34 | -2,619% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.38 | 5.19 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.48 | 10.81 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.56 | -4.14 | -714% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement