Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.53
Change+$0.05 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental AdvantagePLUS Inst
Price$7.89
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets380.63M
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.69B vs. PFATX (381M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PFATX: CBHIX (4.22) vs PFATX (2.99). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (13 years) vs PFATX (18 years). PFATX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 666.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.71 vs. PFATX (1.26). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 13.17 vs. CBHIX (8.28).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.13 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.406 | 5.153 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 381M | 706% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 2.99 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 1.26 | 452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.37 | 1.67 | 562% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.28 | 13.17 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.32 | 1.03 | 2,463% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement