Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PFATX
CBHIX vs PFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PFATX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 3.53B vs. PFATX (456M). PFATX pays higher dividends than CBHIX: PFATX (6.38) vs CBHIX (3.61). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PFATX: CBHIX (14 years) vs PFATX (19 years). PFATX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PFATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 867.00 vs. CBHIX (60.00). PFATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PFATX (1000000) vs CBHIX (2000000). PFATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.47 vs. CBHIX (13.45). PFATX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. CBHIX (20.80).
| CBHIX | PFATX | CBHIX / PFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.10 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.753 | 17.063 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 456M | 774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 6.38 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.45 | 20.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.59 | 23.81 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.80 | 30.31 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.76 | 18.72 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement