Ad is loading...
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.45
Change-$0.02 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets458.06M
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a StrongBuy and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.55B vs. PTFAX (458M). CBHIX pays higher dividends than PTFAX: CBHIX (4.62) vs PTFAX (2.73). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (12 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CBHIX (87.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. PTFAX (-3.48). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 6.31 vs. PTFAX (-4.13).
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.191 | 2.449 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 458M | 557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.62 | 2.73 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.87 | -3.48 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.49 | 2.07 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.31 | -4.13 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.02 | -10.17 | -236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...