Ad is loading...
CBHIX vs PTFAX
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison
Open Charts CBHIX vs PTFAX
Victory Market Neutral Income I
Price$8.79
Change+$0.05 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
PIMCO RAE Fundamental Advantage PLUS A
Price$7.39
Change-$0.05 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.83M
CBHIX vs PTFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBHIX vs. PTFAX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBHIX is a Hold and PTFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBHIX has more cash in the bank: 2.56B vs. PTFAX (426M). PTFAX pays higher dividends than CBHIX: PTFAX (4.96) vs CBHIX (4.39). CBHIX was incepted earlier than PTFAX: CBHIX (12 years) vs PTFAX (17 years). PTFAX (1.73) is less costly to investors than CBHIX (0.58). PTFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 443.00 vs. CBHIX (88.00). PTFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBHIX: PTFAX (1000) vs CBHIX (2000000). CBHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. PTFAX (-3.33). CBHIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.95 vs. PTFAX (9.38).
| CBHIX | PTFAX | CBHIX / PTFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.73 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.73 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.881 | 2.499 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 426M | 601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 4.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.17 | -3.33 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.10 | -3.34 | -123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.95 | 9.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.61 | -9.90 | -289% |